Search for: "DOES 1-8"
Results 3961 - 3980
of 32,304
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Oct 2018, 1:00 am
The BoA does not admit said request into the appeal proceedings. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 7:19 pm
According to the court, the legislation does not comply with Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 3:37 am
Petitioner had already been using the mark UVF461, and looked to a bulb with twice as much wattage: thus the "8" in the subject mark instead of the "4" in the prior mark. [read post]
12 Jul 2021, 7:06 pm
Or does its application merely mirror the intent already well disclosed in the developing rhetoric from 2019 ans 2020? [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 6:00 am
Plaintiff James Dean, Inc. filed a trademark complaint against Twitter, as well as the fictitious persons, John Doe Defendants 1-5 Company, in an Indiana state court. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 4:00 am
The Commissioner noted that [1] any such additional affidavits, exhibits and other supporting papers “may only be submitted with the prior permission of the Commissioner,” citing 8 NYCRR §276.5 and [2] although this provision permits the submission of additional evidence, “it cannot be used to buttress allegations in the petition. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 5:00 am
Under Rule 14a-8, a shareholder who has held $2,000 or 1 percent of a company’s stock for one year may submit a proposal to be included in the company’s proxy statement for a vote by all shareholders. [read post]
26 Nov 2015, 9:30 am
L. 112-59, §§ 331(8), 336). [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 3:42 am
Should our readers be involved in an appeal involving the selection of a continuous sub-range, they may wish to request a referral of this question under Article 112(1)(a) EPC as being a point of law of fundamental importance. [read post]
18 Aug 2021, 11:34 pm
The innovation patent was conceived as a simpler, faster, and more economical, form of protection for inventions compared to a standard patent or provisional patent.Unlike a standard patent, an innovation patent does not require the applicant to demonstrate an "inventive step". [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 8:42 am
In the decision, Justice Akhtar confirmed that “the harshness of [a] provision does not make it invalid if both parties have agreed to it”. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 10:40 am
Disclaimer This update has been prepared by Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP for informational purposes only and does not constitute advertising, a solicitation, or legal advice, is not promised or guaranteed to be correct or complete and may or may not reflect the most current legal developments. [read post]
8 Jul 2021, 6:49 am
Or does its application merely mirror the intent already well disclosed in the developing rhetoric from 2019 ans 2020? [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 9:08 am
Dec. 8, 2023) When does TM logic creep into false advertising cases? [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 2:18 pm
Here are some rights that most parents don't even know they have:1) Right to telephone or in person notification st the time the the IHSS starts, California Education Code §48911.1(d)2) Right to written notice of the IHSS if it will go longer than one period (although the code does not say when), California Education Code §48911.1(d)3) Right to have an IHSS imposed only when "other means of correction" fail to bring… [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 2:12 pm
8. [read post]
12 Apr 2014, 6:39 am
., (“Roche”) appealsfrom the decision of the United States District Court forthe District of New Jersey granting the defendant genericdrug companies summary judgment of invalidity as toclaims 1-8 of U.S. [read post]
7 May 2023, 9:30 pm
Corp. v Zoning Bd. of Appeals, Town of Mount Pleasant, 128 AD3d 817, citing Doe v Lake Grove Sch., 107 AD3d 841; 6. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 5:22 am
8. [read post]
7 May 2023, 9:30 pm
Corp. v Zoning Bd. of Appeals, Town of Mount Pleasant, 128 AD3d 817, citing Doe v Lake Grove Sch., 107 AD3d 841; 6. [read post]
