Search for: "John Doe 6"
Results 3961 - 3980
of 6,724
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jun 2013, 2:41 am
In re John Lankshear, Serial No. 85239139 (June 6, 2013) [not precedential].To support a Section 2(e)(3) refusal, the PTO must first show that the place named in the mark is generally known to relevant consumers, and not remote or obscure. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 4:56 pm
John Doe Article. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 9:34 am
Again, the earliest copyright registration for theatrical works began within a decade of the Act.5 (Theatre took a while to rebuild during this period in large part because the Continental Congress had banned it during the Revolutionary War.)6 The EFF is technically correct that the 1790 Act didn’t include many visual works that are protected today, but if we are looking more generally at what the Founders thought of copyright, than even this point does not hold true. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 6:24 am
” (6) Perhaps, but the losses from hamstringing government can mount pretty quickly too. [read post]
16 Jun 2013, 3:49 pm
April (6) Adoptive Couple v. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 1:23 pm
., Arthur Phoenix of Phoenix, Ariz. and John Does 1-5. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 8:39 pm
John's, in Porterville, which would require a full trial. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 3:59 am
It does this directly by granting intellectual property rights. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 7:05 pm
The appellant lost in Ex parte WeinerKSR is mentioned:“The combination of familiar elements according to known methodsis likely to be obvious when it does no more than yield predictable results. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 8:00 am
It held unanimously that it does not. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 1:24 pm
Disintermediation and Copyright So what does this all of this have to do with copyright? [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 9:10 am
That’s a lesson right there in 12(b)(6) practice I could stand to use myself. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 6:16 am
Table of Contents Section 1: Use of Fictitious Names or Pseudonyms in Connecticut Courts Table 1: John or Jane Doe Defendants in Civil Matters Table 2: John or Jane Doe Defendants in Summary Process Matters Section 2: Use of Fictitious Business Names in Connecticut Table 3: Use of Fictitious Business Names Section 3: Criminal Impersonation in Connecticut Published: 6/6/2013 9:20 AM [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am
Sander Greenland and others have raised various theoretical objections to the argument that relative risks should exceed two before attribution can be made in specific cases. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 10:27 pm
Read comments and post your comment here.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 12:50 pm
John Elwood reviews Monday’s relisted cases. [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 1:30 am
But that does little for investors who have already invested and believe they were misled. [read post]
2 Jun 2013, 9:26 am
What it does, however, is cool, and cool in a big way. [read post]
2 Jun 2013, 9:26 am
What it does, however, is cool, and cool in a big way. [read post]
31 May 2013, 11:48 pm
John Douglass. [read post]
