Search for: "Lay v. Lay"
Results 3961 - 3980
of 8,598
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jun 2015, 7:22 am
Supp. 547, 556–57 (E.D.N.C. 1995) (ruling that an expert witness may opine about comparisons between boat engines in rough water but only as a lay witness, because the comparison tests were unreliable, with a high estimated rate of error) FIFTH CIRCUIT Albert v. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 8:30 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2015, 4:30 am
Court of Appeal in 'Equustek Solutions Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 11:50 am
In the case, Equustek Solutions v. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 9:23 am
We meet her in Chapter V, The Wine Shop, where she sits, knits, and “sees nothing. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 6:38 am
” This statement sounds very much like the interpretive principle underlying one of John Marshall’s most famous remarks in McCulloch v. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm
Certainly Roe v. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 1:21 pm
But on Monday of this week, in RREF BB Acquisitions, LLC v. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 6:00 am
This is part two of a two-part interview with Ilya Somin about his new book, The Grasping Hand: Kelo v. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 4:34 am
Lord Sumption, referring to Lord Hoffmann’s speech in Matadeen v Pointu [1999] 1 AC 98 and that of Baroness Hale in Ghaidan v Godin-Mendoza [2004] 2 AC 557, stated that the principle of equality was “not a principle special to the jurisprudence of the European Union. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 8:00 am
Noe v. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 3:45 am
A string search for cases won’t teach you the lay of the land in an area of law that isn’t second nature to you. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 2:18 pm
" Hanf v. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 3:15 pm
When dividing the border for the British Raj during Partition, Sir Cyril Radcliffe omitted to allocate the Berubari Union—a small enclave on the Indo-Bangladesh border—leading both parties to lay claim to the territory (This may have been because Cyril Radcliffe, who was given five weeks to divide the countries, had never set foot in India before the border demarcation). [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 4:04 am
Bodle v. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 4:04 am
Bodle v. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 12:58 pm
¶50 (quoting Keels v. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 10:22 am
Frito-Lay N. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 7:31 am
Further, many firms get no funding at all (and the paper has scant details on that).To answer these questions, at the very least I would love to see a crosstab of funding versus early round patenting to see what portion of the funding moved to the early patentees v. not. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 10:45 am
” Tracomin SA v. [read post]
