Search for: "Alexander Interactive, Inc."
Results 21 - 40
of 56
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Apr 2018, 9:35 am
On April 17, 2018, Catherine Alexander, a tattoo artist from Illinois, sued Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc., 2K Games, Inc., 2K Sports, Inc., World Wrestling Entertainment, Inc. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 9:35 am
On April 17, 2018, Catherine Alexander, a tattoo artist from Illinois, sued Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc., 2K Games, Inc., 2K Sports, Inc., World Wrestling Entertainment, Inc. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 7:55 pm
See Alexander Holmes, Appellant-Defendant, v. [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 3:27 am
John Reed Stark As I noted in a recent post (here), the business pages these days are full of headlines about Initial Coin Offerings (ICOs). [read post]
27 Oct 2017, 6:01 am
Karp, Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP, on Friday, October 20, 2017 Tags: Class actions, Dodd-Frank Act, Fraud-on-the-Market, Rule 10b-5, Section 10(b), Securities enforcement, Securities fraud, Securities litigation, Securities regulation, SLUSA, Supreme Court, Whistleblowers Director Networks, Turnover, and Appointments Posted by Luc Renneboog, Tilburg University, and Yang Zhao, Newcastle University,… [read post]
27 Aug 2016, 11:28 am
Benchmark Builders, Inc., et al., C.A. [read post]
CAFC in Shukh: concrete and particularized reputational injury can give rise to Article III standing
2 Oct 2015, 11:08 am
SEAGATE contains a most interesting discussion of inventor-employer interactions, in the context of a correction of inventorship case.From the decision-->Alexander Shukh appeals from the district court’sdismissal of some of his claims for failure to state a claimand its grants of summary judgment on his remainingclaims in favor of the defendants, Seagate Technology,LLC; Seagate Technology, Inc.; Seagate Technology; andSeagate Technology PLC (collectively,… [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 7:11 am
Amdocs, Inc. et al, 1-14-cv-00732 (DED April 15, 2015, Order) (Andrews, J.) [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 7:25 am
Moving to Latin America, the floor was taken by Barbarita Guzmán, who focused on interaction between trade marks and copyright -- also considering the ‘moral rights’ issue in Bolivia, Colombia, Peru, and Ecuador. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 6:13 am
That's exactly what one lawyer called another in Alexander Interactive v. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 4:20 am
IndyMac MBS, Inc., a case that has significant implications for securities class actions and the efficient operation of the federal courts. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 7:13 am
He referred in particular to comments by Laddie J in Mercury Communications Ltd v Mercury Interactive (UK) Ltd [1995] FSR 850, at 863-865; by Jacob J in Laboratoire De La Mer Trade Marks [2002] FSR 51, at [19]; and by Aldous LJ in Thomson Holidays v Norwegian Cruise Line [2002] EWCA Civ 1828; [2003] RPC 32, at [29]. [read post]
18 May 2014, 5:30 am
GOOGLE INC., Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit 2014 http://t.co/YNRT6CVQ8c -> Computer and Internet Law Updates for 2014-05-14: Google looms as 'censor-in-chief' after ‘right to be forgott… http://t.co/3Hd3o8eBDU -> Google swamped by takedown requests after court ruling http://t.co/2LR9C5KTaR -> Politician and paedophile ask Google to 'be forgotten' http://t.co/xp4E72KNuZ -> One Court Ruling on Privacy in Europe, and 28 Regulators … [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 8:44 am
What can you tell us about that interaction? [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 7:02 pm
” Walter Alexander Robinson, III Dep. 45:15–21, 79:1–4, Aug. 9, 2013. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 7:41 pm
Final version to be published as “Dynamic Societal Constitutionalism: Transnational corporations’ outward expression of inward self constitution: The enforcement of human rights by Apple, Inc. [read post]
20 Jul 2013, 10:39 am
Dynamic Societal Constitutionalism: Transnational corporations’ outward expression of inward self-constitution: The enforcement of human rights by Apple, Inc. [read post]
13 May 2013, 1:00 pm
© 2013 Alexander J. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 7:29 am
Over the last few weeks, Apple Inc. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 8:24 am
In re Pfizer Inc. [read post]
