Search for: "Alexander v. Smith" Results 21 - 40 of 265
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Aug 2011, 6:29 am by Kiran Bhat
Yesterday the American Bar Association filed an amicus brief in Smith v. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 6:00 am by Juvan Bonni
 David Boundy: Administrative Law Observations on Cuozzo Speed Technologies v. [read post]
2 Jan 2020, 12:37 pm
  I thought it fascinating that, in holding that Volkoff and Jane Doe were not one and the same (even though they obviously were), Judge Smith's opinion never once mentions the fact that we're talking about Alexander Volkoff and Jane Doe. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 5:30 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Today, Charrise Alexander has a good post on why insurance is essential for a number of services that are part of the ‘sharing economy. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
DonovanRethinking People v. [read post]
This is the second of three blogs examining the recent UK Court of Appeal decision in Lidl v Tesco[1]. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 1:54 pm by Giles Peaker
Willow Court Management Company (1985) Ltd v Alexander [2016] UKUT 0290 (LC) (our note) set out guidance for how and when rule 13 costs awards will be engaged and awarded in the First Tier Tribunal (for unreasonable conduct). [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 6:58 am by INFORRM
On the one hand, the argument for the fragility of Sullivan after Bruen is examined in Alexander Hiland & Michael L Smith “Using Bruen to Overturn New York Times v Sullivan” 50 Pepperdine Law Review (forthcoming) (SSRN). [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 3:34 am
Judgment for defendants Counsel: For the claimant: James Abrahams For the first defendant: Anna Edwards-Stuart For the second defendant: Daniel Alexander QC, Charlotte May Solicitors: For the claimant: Field Fisher Waterhouse LLP For the first defendant: Manches LLP For the second defendant: Herbert Smith LLP LTL 6/8/2012 [read post]
23 Nov 2021, 11:22 am by Emily Coward
Smith, 860 S.E.2d 51 (2021) (unpublished) (citing this framework from Hobbs). [read post]
9 Apr 2007, 12:38 pm
I, p. 340.)We write today to 'own' that the procedure we approved in Biljac Associates v. [read post]