Search for: "Amin v. State"
Results 21 - 40
of 83
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Aug 2019, 8:54 am
To support application of the escape clause in this case, the Department relies heavily on the decision in Amin v. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 2:00 am
However, the Department of Labor (DOL) has endorsed the following nonexhaustive, seven-factor “Primary Beneficiary Test,” which was established by the 2nd Circuit in Glatt v. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 5:45 am
We are reminded in Claybar v. [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 6:54 pm
” Pfizer, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Aug 2017, 8:52 am
SAS Institute v. [read post]
16 Aug 2017, 8:52 am
SAS Institute v. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 11:50 pm
Bishop-Burney, Prosecutor v. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 6:00 am
Each Thursday we present a significant excerpt, usually from a recently published book or journal article. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 9:03 am
United States of America v. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 6:34 am
App. 1996)(finding Turkish/Islamic law not in conformity with North Carolina law in custody proceeding); Amin v. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 5:42 am
For an interesting recent case dealing with this question, see AFDI v. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 4:05 pm
Then, in November 2006, Jackie sent Amine an e-mail message, which stated in part, “Per your last request I have kept my distance from you for the past six years. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 5:02 am
Virginia State Bd. of Educ. v. [read post]
28 Nov 2014, 7:01 am
This speech is thus entitled to even greater First Amendment protection than the speech at issue in [United States v. [read post]
30 Aug 2014, 6:55 am
Following the recent filing of a petition for rehearing en banc by the detainees in the Allaithi v. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 7:17 pm
Co. v. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 12:57 pm
Jude Medical, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 9:34 am
Novartis Grimsby Ltd. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am
United States, 597 F. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 1:42 pm
The Appeals Court summarized the case saying, Universal Crop Protection Alliance, LLC, a formulator and distributor of a herbicide known as 2,4-D (or 2,4-D Amine), and its parent company, Universal Cooperatives (collectively, Universal), successfully defended a lawsuit brought by a group of cotton farmers in Arkansas state court for damages arising from off-target aerial application of the herbicide. [read post]
