Search for: "BARNARD v. US "
Results 21 - 40
of 73
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Nov 2017, 7:40 am
Panel: Marialyn Barnard, Justice, Rebeca C. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 7:40 am
Panel: Marialyn Barnard, Justice, Rebeca C. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 1:54 pm
Div. 1958) (inadequate lighting of parking lot of supermarket, fall over unknown object).Barnard v. [read post]
27 Jul 2017, 9:12 am
Barnard, 362 N.C. 244, 246 (2008). [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 5:35 am
Supreme Court, in Graham v. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 9:30 pm
In the 1950s, her legal scholarship helped Thurgood Marshall challenge segregation head-on in the landmark Brown v. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 4:00 am
”In Connick v Myers, 461 US 138, the U.S. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 7:20 am
In her concurrence, Justice Barnard noted her concern that allowing the employee to retain state court jurisdiction by affirmatively averring that he was not alleging any federal causes of action and then allowing the employee to bring an out-of-time federal claim by use of the relation-back doctrine provided an unfair advantage to the employee and allowed for action that “smacks of gamesmanship. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 9:34 am
Novartis Grimsby Ltd. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2013, 10:04 am
§9-10-185.13.PLAINTIFF'S USE OF AWARD. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 8:16 am
Bouchoux (2009, 2013) Legal Writing: Getting it Right and Getting it Written, by Mary Barnard Ray and Jill J. [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 4:06 pm
UK information is available here; more detailed US data can be found here. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 4:32 pm
Macaulay is also known for his use of empirical research and interdisciplinary theories to illuminate our knowledge of contracting practices. [read post]
13 Jan 2013, 5:14 am
Nature of Exemplary Damages and the Recommendation Exemplary damages are a special category of damages which is designed to punish the defendant and to vindicate the strength of the law (see Rookes v Barnard [1964] AC 1129 at 1221). [read post]
6 Dec 2012, 3:06 pm
Barnard Construction Co., Inc., 146 F 3d. 214, 220 (10th Cir. 1998); Anderson v. [read post]
2 Sep 2012, 3:02 pm
“Bush v. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 7:48 am
Lots of proponents of the use of drones in warfare tout fewer pilots put at risk in dangerous missions, but what about the financial cost of drones v. manned aircraft? [read post]
5 Aug 2012, 2:35 pm
§9-10-185.13.PLAINTIFF'S USE OF AWARD. [read post]
Indiana Trade Dress Litigation Update – Mortar Net USA v. Masonry Reinforcing Corporation of America
11 Jul 2012, 6:49 am
Hohmann & Barnard Inc. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 4:04 pm
The four who were on the negotiating team outside of AUCC (and presumably AUCC counsel) were: David Barnard (University of Manitoba), Elizabeth Cannon (University of Calgary), Patrick Deane (McMaster University), and Tim McTiernan (University of Ontario Institute of Technology). [read post]
