Search for: "Bank of New York v. Bright" Results 21 - 40 of 85
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Sep 2022, 9:00 pm by Kyle Hulehan
Proponents of the surtax estimate that the Commonwealth will raise $2 billion in new annual revenue from the tax increase. [read post]
23 May 2022, 8:55 am by Laurence H. Tribe
  Those exchanges have been illuminating but are tangential to the proposal I advanced in The New York Times. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 12:25 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  The holding company operated out of New York, where the allegedly false statements were made. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 5:30 am by Sherron Watkins
Hence the call to a New York-based attorney I had worked with in the early 1990s when I lived in Manhattan and worked for a commodity finance group. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 11:39 am by Kevin LaCroix
” The plaintiff had contended that the transaction agreement became binding when it was signed in New York, while the defendant had argued that it became binding under New York law only when it was sent to Bermuda and signed there. [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 11:21 am by David Greene
They are generally an ill fit for the bright lines we insist on for laws that limit speech. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 2:24 am by Schachtman
Three justices, in dissent, would have applied a bright-line bare metal defense, as contended for by petitioners.[4] The majority eschewed both the invariant bare metal defense and the Third Circuit’s infinitely flexible forseeability test, for a “third way. [read post]
25 May 2018, 12:21 pm by Kelsey Farish
In particular, the lawsuit alleged that publishers – including the New York Times, TIME, and Economist – shared licensed articles written by freelancers to the Lexis/Nexis electronic database and other digital indexers, without first obtaining the writers’ approval.James Gleick was previously a reporter and editor for The New York Times for 10 years. [read post]
11 Feb 2018, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
For her first affirmative defense and objection, Irene asserted that the prenuptial agreement was defective, invalid, and unenforceable pursuant to the 2013 New York Court of Appeals decision in Galetta v Galetta, 21 N.Y.3d 186, because the acknowledgments omitted language expressly stating that the notaries knew the signers or had ascertained, through some sort of proof, that the signers were the persons described as required by Domestic Relations Law § 236(B)(3). [read post]
5 May 2017, 12:16 am by The CGCP Team
District Court for the Southern District of New York, Judge LI Bing of the Supreme People’s Court (“SPC”) (who, together with Judges GUO Feng and SHI Lei, oversees the GCS), and Dr. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 11:17 am by Mark Walsh
In the consolidated argument in Bank of America Corp. v. [read post]