Search for: "Baxter v. United States"
Results 21 - 40
of 206
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jul 2013, 12:00 am
After the court refused the motion, the plaintiff moved to certify a proposed class of "[a]ll persons residing in the United States who hold a United States copyright interest in one or more books reproduced by Google. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 8:31 am
Ronald V. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 8:31 am
Ronald V. [read post]
19 May 2011, 2:20 pm
” (8) Recently, the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio found that 35 U.S.C. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 10:04 am
(See United States v. [read post]
19 Jan 2013, 3:47 am
See United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 11:07 am
You get more 5-4 decisions in the United States Supreme Court than 4-3 decisions in the California Supreme Court. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 6:09 am
United States v. [read post]
26 May 2023, 1:21 pm
’s passage to the United States. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 9:20 am
Kraweloc’s co-counsel, Michael Rubin, responded that the decision would have retroactive effect, pursuant to controlling United States Supreme Court authority. [read post]
2 Sep 2018, 11:49 am
In United States v. [read post]
25 Jul 2021, 11:16 am
Baxter v. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 1:25 pm
” Baxter Healthcare Corp. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2025, 11:00 pm
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit is looking at March 2025 oral arguments in United Spinal Association, et al. v. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 4:34 pm
The purpose of that concurring opinion is to express disagreement with the Ninth Circuit’s “mistaken belief”—stated most recently in United States v. [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 5:36 pm
United States, 597 F. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 2:42 pm
And before that, we had retirements by Justices Werdegar, Baxter, Kennard, Moreno and George -- all within the past decade or so, and all of whom (I believe) remain alive and kicking to this very day.Try to get a similar list of United States Supreme Court justices who've left, particularly in the current political era. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 2:05 am
United States, 880 F.2d 84, 86-87 (8th Cir. 1989).Kansas: Savina v. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 4:27 am
Chang v. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 7:52 am
Hillman of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, sitting by designation, recently granted a motion to drop two parties from the litigation pursuant to Rule 21. [read post]
