Search for: "Bear v. State"
Results 21 - 40
of 14,839
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2024, 10:10 am
The order in Sandoval v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 6:41 am
In most states, a lawyer may share court-awarded fees with a nonprofit organization that employed, retained or recommended the lawyer’s employment. [read post]
13 May 2024, 4:05 am
In Zăicescu and Fălticineanu v. [read post]
12 May 2024, 9:05 pm
Raimondo and Relentless, Inc. v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:01 am
Circuit’s application of the Fitzgerald test in Blassingame v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:00 am
Indeed, even in circumstances where an arbitrator makes errors of law or fact, courts will not assume the role of overseers to conform the award to their sense of justice" (Matter of New York State Correctional Officers & Police Benevolent Assn. v State of New York, 94 NY2d 321, 326 [1999]). [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:00 am
Indeed, even in circumstances where an arbitrator makes errors of law or fact, courts will not assume the role of overseers to conform the award to their sense of justice" (Matter of New York State Correctional Officers & Police Benevolent Assn. v State of New York, 94 NY2d 321, 326 [1999]). [read post]
10 May 2024, 3:27 am
See State v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 2:30 am
Advanced Cell Diagnostics v Molecular Instruments [2024] EWHC 898 (Pat) On 23 April 2024, Mr Justice Meade handed down his judgment in the dispute between Advanced Cell Diagnostics (ACD) and Molecular Instruments (MI). [read post]
9 May 2024, 11:14 am
Div. 2009) 4 Adams v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 9:14 am
Ball State University, where a student sued alleging a professor’s advances created a hostile learning environment, and Doe v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am
Bd., 64 F3d 184, 188 [5th Cir 1995], citing Tinker v Des Moines Indep. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am
Bd., 64 F3d 184, 188 [5th Cir 1995], citing Tinker v Des Moines Indep. [read post]
9 May 2024, 5:55 am
Second, based on the first conclusion, and as established by the ICJ in Bosnia v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 5:29 am
The ECHR refers to the case of Đurđević v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 2:00 pm
There's surely a right to informational privacy at some level, but the biographical information at issue isn't all that intimate, and it's protected from public dissemination anyway, and the text of the Second Amendment only covers the right to bear arms, not to keep the stuff secret from a Legislatively-chosen group of researchers who are helping the Legislature draft policy, particularly when numerous other public officials already have unchallenged access to this same… [read post]
8 May 2024, 1:44 pm
Ariz. v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 1:01 pm
The Florida “crack bear” bill passed, so it’s now a little easier to justify killing a bear in that state. [read post]
