Search for: "Berkeley v. Berkeley" Results 21 - 40 of 2,706
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 May 2009, 2:20 am
Commissioners for Revenue and Customs v Annabel's (Berkeley Square) Ltd and Others Court of Appeal “Restaurant employers were not entitled to use discretionary tips, gratuities and service charges paid by customers to waiters and bar staff by card or cheque made out to the employer and subsequently transmitted to the workers by a tronc system to top [...] [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 6:09 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
(In many ways this is the brief's strongest argument, because this reference is clearly prior art to the earliest-filed Broad provisional, and Berkeley has a strong argument that the Board not considering it was legal error.)Finally, Berkeley argues that Broad had not shown that it was entitled to the December 12, 2012 filing date of its earlier provisional. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 3:24 pm by Cal Law
Cruz’s legal team is led by Shanta Driver of Michigan-based By Any Means Necessary, a coalition that agitated in support of affirmative action in Grutter v. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 12:22 pm by Jonathan Zasloff
Download as PDF The post CEQA and UC Berkeley Housing: Don’t Panic appeared first on Legal Planet. [read post]
9 Feb 2007, 7:41 am
" [abstract] [full paper] Hila Keren, Faculty of Law, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, "Law in the Cultivation of Hope" [abstract] [full paper] Elizabeth V. [read post]
7 May 2024, 3:38 pm by Eugene Volokh
Berkeley Dean Erwin Chemerinsky—who is also a noted scholar of constitutional law and academic freedom—joins Jane Bambauer and me to discuss student speech controversies (including the one that was literally in Erwin's back yard), as well as faculty academic freedom in scholarship, public commentary, and teaching.The post Free Speech Unmuted: Campus Speech, with Dean Erwin Chemerinsky (Berkeley Law) appeared first on Reason.com. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 4:08 pm by Arthur F. Coon
Following up on previous posts (see February and May archives), the City of Berkeley Respondents and the Kapors (Real Parties in Interest) filed their joint 80-page opening brief on the merits on July 27 in Berkeley Hillside Preservation, et al. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 4:08 pm by Arthur F. Coon
Following up on previous posts (see February and May archives), the City of Berkeley Respondents and the Kapors (Real Parties in Interest) filed their joint 80-page opening brief on the merits on July 27 in Berkeley Hillside Preservation, et al. v. [read post]
22 May 2008, 5:10 am
On May 14, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals heard oral arguments (audio recording) in Caldwell v. [read post]