Search for: "Burlington Industries, Inc. v. Ellerth" Results 21 - 40 of 61
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Aug 2016, 8:01 am by Joy Waltemath
Employers may be liable for the tortious actions of an employee acting outside the scope of his employment, including where the tort in question is attributable to the employer’s own negligence, reasoned the court, as recognized in Burlington Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 6:20 pm by Robin E. Shea
The vicarious liability standard for supervisor harassment was announced in two Supreme Court decisions from 1998: Burlington Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 1:24 pm by Steven G. Pearl
Here is the case in a nutshell, taken from the majority opinion written by Justice Alito (joined by Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Scalia, Kennedy, and Thomas):  In this case, we decide a question left open in Burlington Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 11:27 am by Sheppard Mullin
Instead, it was adopted by the Supreme Court as a way to identify those individuals whose actions could give rise to vicarious employer liability in the two earlier decisions of Burlington Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 5:59 pm by Tom Crane
  The Supreme Court relied on the decisions in Burlington Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 10:16 am by Brian Peterson
  11-556 (decided June 24, 2013) (PDF), the United States Supreme Court decided a question left open in Burlington Industries, Inc. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 4:46 am by Kedar Bhatia
City of Boca Raton and Burlington Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2013, 3:49 pm by Kedar Bhatia
City of Boca Raton and Burlington Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 11:38 am by Kedar Bhatia
City of Boca Raton and Burlington Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Sep 2012, 7:10 am
The core issue here is whether the supervisor liability rule, as established in Burlington Industries, Inc. v. [read post]