Search for: "Bush v. Clark" Results 21 - 40 of 124
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Oct 2009, 10:12 pm
  The paper, Iqbal and Bad Apples (which will be published in a symposium issue of the Lewis & Clark Law Review), expands upon a point I made in passing in an earlier FindLaw column:  that, in addition to its difficulties as a civil procedure case, the Supreme Court's decision in Ashcroft v. [read post]
The plaintiffs argue that this creates a separate tier for how votes are scrutinized in Clark County and the rest of Nevada counties and cite the highly controversial Bush v. [read post]
5 Sep 2007, 4:40 pm
Clark, 335 U.S. 188 (1948) Marino v. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 9:59 pm
More federalism in administering Atkins When the Supreme Court declared in Atkins v. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 3:10 am
Through Coffey’s involvment with the Elian Gonzalez trial to its surprising connection to Bush v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 3:31 pm by Rick Hasen
Lane, 66 Ohio State Law Journal 177 (2005) The California Recall Punch Card Litigation: Why Bush v. [read post]
2 Dec 2006, 11:03 am
  Since I spent much of this week putting together my syllabus for my Constitutional Law I class next semester, which includes Judge Bates's decision in Public Citizen v. [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 5:01 am by Jonathan Shaub
The most famous case on executive privilege is United States v. [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 10:34 am by Florian Mueller
President Bush said that the president has to focus on the day that comes, not the day that has ended. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 11:20 am by David Oscar Markus
Thomas Law Review have put together a symposium next weekend (November 12-13, 2010) entitled Bush v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 3:44 pm by Kaimipono D. Wenger
:  Judicial Impartiality and the Supreme Court in Bush v. [read post]
14 Feb 2009, 3:53 pm
Clark, 335 U.S. 188 (1948) and Rasul v. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 2:45 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Clark would seem to foreclose such a challenge. [read post]
3 May 2013, 6:11 am by Rachel Sachs
Thursday’s coverage of the Court continued to focus on retired Justice Sandra Day O’Connor’s recent comments to The Chicago Tribune, in which she expressed doubt about the Court’s grant of certiorari in Bush v. [read post]