Search for: "CF-3"
Results 21 - 40
of 2,364
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Aug 2018, 11:30 pm
According to G 1/10 (see Order), however, such a request is inadmissible whenever made.3. [read post]
22 Nov 2012, 5:01 pm
Turning to G 6/91 cited by the appellant-opponent, this decision by the EBA considered the questions concerning inter alia filing requirements for fee reduction under R 6(3) arising in a specific case in which an appeal was filed in the form of a letter in Dutch accompanied by a translation into English, cf. summary, point II. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 5:21 am
Cir. 2000) (an argument not first raised in the brief to the Board is waived on appeal); cf. [read post]
21 May 2013, 11:31 am
All along, agents have been told, at least implicitly, that their services aren't necessary (cf: Navigators). [read post]
29 May 2015, 10:39 am
================The DJ's DAR "inside insight" chart shows that in April the Courts of Appeal published 75 opinions (cf. there were 66 in March and 74 in February). [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 4:22 am
Cf. [read post]
4 Jan 2015, 7:44 am
Jesus called his disciples to “rest a while” (cf. [read post]
27 Dec 2021, 11:19 am
The only other creatures were 3 horses and — incredibly! [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 8:11 pm
Section 3. [read post]
10 Nov 2017, 3:39 am
Amended claim 1 of auxiliary request 3 defines the first and second primers by the feature that "each of said first and second primer hybridizes with said sequence of SEQ ID NO: 17", and further requires that they "specifically generate an amplicon if such MRSA strain is present in said sample" (cf. point XII supra). [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 9:00 pm
(Cf. point 2.3.1 des motifs)Décision T899/13 [read post]
24 Dec 2014, 5:11 am
Cf. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 1:04 pm
(cf. fn 2). [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 6:01 pm
G 1/10 [13]).Obviously, all the “corrected” requests where then dismissed based on a violation of A 123(3).Should you wish to download the whole decision, just click here.The file wrapper can be found here. [read post]
14 May 2015, 5:37 am
The appropriateness of the appointment of the personal representative, i.e., whether administration was necessary, could be determined on an objection to the appointment under UPC Section 3-414(b); cf., Sections 3-608 to 3-612. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 1:24 am
"2.2 Novelty in view of D5 (Article 54(3) EPC)2.2.1 The appellant submitted that, as already acknowledged by the examining division in the appealed decision, document D5 did not disclose the features of the characterising portion of claim 1 as amended, namely the ones of former claims 4 and 5 as well as former claims 17 and 18, i.e. features (c) and (d).2.2.2 The appealed decision contained novelty objections under Article 54(3) EPC with respect to indep [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 3:21 pm
art. 3 let. e LPD), soit effectué en conformité à la loi. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 8:08 am
O agravo foi interposto no último dia 8, nos autos do Recurso Extraordinário (RE) 477554, com fundamento no artigo 226, parágrafo 3º, da Constituição Federal (CF), segundo o qual, “para efeito da proteção do Estado, é reconhecida a união estável entre o homem e a mulher como entidade familiar”. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 12:34 am
In their further communications under Article 94(3) EPC of 3 December 2015 and 27 March 2017, the examining division maintained their non-unity objection. [read post]
28 Sep 2018, 8:25 am
There should be no remaining real possibility of a party or the public suspecting bias after a decision by a board (cf. decisions G 1/05, OJ EPO 2007, 362, points 2 and 7; J 15/04 of 30 May 2006, points 12 and 13; T 584/09 of 1 March 2013, point 7; and R 2/15 of 21 October 2015, points 3 and 4).4. [read post]
