Search for: "California Supreme Court and Its Judges from 1987 to Present" Results 21 - 40 of 156
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Dec 2021, 9:17 am by John Floyd
Aziz was released on parole in 1985, while Islam was paroled two years later in 1987. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 8:26 pm by David Kopel
Little has changed since Judge Posner's assessment. [read post]
The person who has been given the POA presents it at the bank, to the credit card company, etc., as proof that they have the authority to act. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Last week the Supreme Court rejected a challenge to the Affordable Care Act (ACA). [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 5:13 pm by Emily Coward
A California appellate court will address this question in People v. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm by Ronald Collins
He served as dean of the law school from 1987-1994 and provost of the University of Chicago from 1994-2002. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 3:46 pm by Glen C. Hansen
District Courts, how will federal judges handle the disputed state law property questions that will likely be at the heart of many of those claims? [read post]
23 Aug 2019, 6:22 am by Greg Mersol
The Dorman case involved a claim under ERISA section 502 for claimed breaches of fiduciary duties based on the employer’s alleged inclusion of investment funds from its affiliates in its 401k plan. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 6:50 am by Barry Sookman
It acknowledged that it can, and often does, exactly what was being asked of it in the case, After it lost its appeal in the Supreme Court, Google subsequently applied to a California court for a declaratory order that the Canadian de-indexing order was not enforceable against it in California. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman and Grant Hayden
Transportation Agency (1987)), and treat pregnant women more favorably than non-pregnant employees (California Federal Savings & Loan Ass’n v. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 11:34 am by Schachtman
Faced with a large backlog of cases created by the rapacious filings of the Pittsburgh plaintiffs’ lawfirms, and Judge O’Kicki’s furlough from judicial service, Judge Creany devised various abridgements of due process, the first of which was to consolidate cases. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 5:22 am by Peter Margulies
Judge Bybee’s methodical opinion could have used elaboration in one important respect: distinguishing the Supreme Court’s decision in Trump v. [read post]
21 Nov 2018, 7:35 am by Peter Margulies
Moreover, as the Supreme Court explained in 1987 Immigration and Naturalization Service v. [read post]