Search for: "Daniels v. State of Mississippi" Results 21 - 40 of 108
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Dec 2020, 9:00 am by Katie Barlow and James Romoser
Mississippi (Nov. 3) Mississippi Deputy Solicitor General Krissy Nobile, Jones v. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 6:30 am by James Romoser
Mississippi (Brett Duffek & Katsuhiro Onishi, Cornell Legal Information Institute) Preview of Borden v. [read post]
28 Jun 2020, 4:36 pm by INFORRM
United States A judge has ruled that Rep. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 3:50 am by Edith Roberts
” In a column for the Chicago Daily Law Bulletin (subscription required), Daniel Cotter “address[es] a rebuke by Chief Justice John G. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 3:53 am by Edith Roberts
State Bar of Wisconsin. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 6:30 am by Mark Graber
Schwartz, The Spirit of the Constitution: John Marshall and the 200-Year Odyssey of McCulloch v. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 7:59 am by Jackie McDermott
“For any state that passes a law that violates the Constitution, and in particular Roe v. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
Citizens, 1919-1924Conveners: Kenneth Mack, Harvard Law School (kmack@law.harvard.edu), Laurie Wood, Florida State University (lmwood@fsu.edu), Jacqueline Briggs, University of Toronto - Centre for Criminology and Sociolegal Studies (jacq.briggs@mail.utoronto.ca), and John Wertheimer, Davidson College (jow [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 4:16 am by Edith Roberts
Hyatt, in which the court will consider whether to overrule a precedent that allows a state to be sued in the courts of another state without its consent. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 11:21 am by John Elwood
One individual petitioner (Daniel Berninger) and two groups of intervenors below [Disclosure: both represented by Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities] argue that the challenges are not moot. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 3:31 am by Edith Roberts
At the Mississippi Business Journal, Ben Williams maintains that “[r]egardless of what Congress and the States do with sports gaming” after the court’s ruling in Murphy v. [read post]