Search for: "Daubert LLC"
Results 21 - 40
of 238
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Mar 2022, 2:09 pm
Risk assessments would seemingly be about assessing risks, but they are not. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 1:42 pm
BMW of North America, LLC et al – United States District Court – Northern District of Ohio – January 24th, 2022) involves a products liability claim against BMW. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 2:22 pm
Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, 752 F.3d 82, 89 (1st Cir. 2014) (affirming exclusion of expert witness who failed to account for confounding in event studies), aff’g 853 F. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 8:29 am
Bumble Bee Foods LLC, 2021 WL 1257845 (9th Cir. [read post]
7 Oct 2021, 4:20 am
Motorola Mobility LLC, the court denied a motion to enhance damages for willfulness because, among other factors, “the accused products were alleged to infringe because of chips made by Qualcomm, which are used industry-wide, rather than technology created by Motorola. [read post]
20 Aug 2021, 10:20 am
In re KIND LLC “Healthy and All Natural” Litig., 2021 WL 1132147, Nos. 15md2645, 15mc2645 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
20 May 2021, 7:59 am
‘Daubert’ Standards The Daubert standard does not appear to take as much issue with “novel” evidence as the Frye standard, as it allows an expert to rely on such evidence so long as it is deemed “reliable. [read post]
24 Mar 2021, 5:01 am
Chrysler Group, LLC for the proposition that the "nondispositive" Daubert order might be sealed merely for good, as opposed to compelling, cause. [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 8:23 am
For example, in 2016 the Electronic Fronter Foundation successfully intervened and obtained an order from the E.D. of Texas to unseal records in a patent case, Blue Spike LLC, v Audible Magic Corp. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 12:24 pm
Supreme Court case of Daubert v. [read post]
19 Nov 2020, 3:18 pm
See Daubert v. [read post]
28 May 2020, 5:29 am
” For example, in the notorious Milward case, the First Circuit, citing legally invalid pre-Daubert decisions, stated that “when the factual underpinning of an expert’s opinion is weak it is a matter affecting the weight and credibility of the testimony − a question to be resolved by the jury. [read post]
13 May 2020, 2:03 am
General Motors, LLC, No. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 9:59 am
First up is CIC Services, LLC v. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 10:31 am
”), citing Daubert v. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 1:00 am
In the case of Three Rivers Hydroponics, LLC v. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 12:30 pm
Air One MRO, LLC (S.D. [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 9:00 am
In UGI Sunbury LLC v. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 9:11 am
Rejecting that argument, the court observed: “Defendant severely misrepresents [the agent’s] opinion testimony by briefly summarizing a few lines of testimony while omitting the bulk of the testimony, and bases his argument on the unsupported and conclusory allegation that the testimony was insufficient to satisfy Daubert. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 2:25 pm
[ii] See Daubert v. [read post]
