Search for: "Davis v. Muse"
Results 21 - 40
of 45
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jul 2022, 9:01 pm
The theory, about which I have written extensively on this site, most recently here, emanates most directly from the musings of three Justices in the (in)famous Bush v. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 11:32 am
Justice Sandra Day O’Connor, aptly described by the chief justice “as a Justice with extensive experience in state and local politics,” recognized this fact almost 40 years ago, writing in Davis v. [read post]
23 Jul 2024, 9:00 pm
As the Supreme Court made clear in Rodriguez de Quijas v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 10:52 am
Several Justices noted that when the constitutionality of the Social Security Act was challenged 75 years ago in Helvering v Davis, the government waived application of the Anti-Injunction Act, something it could not do if the Act were a jurisdictional bar. [read post]
8 Jan 2025, 9:01 pm
Amidst all the pain surrounding desegregation in Arkansas, Roberts lionized Davies, noting that he “missed his own son’s wedding to see through his charge to follow the law. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 9:01 pm
See Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 3:23 pm
Kerr offered to the Justices in Davis v. [read post]
25 May 2013, 2:30 pm
Davis, 2003 BCSC 2011? [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 6:54 am
Matheny v. [read post]
8 May 2015, 9:18 am
” We were briefly excited when Davis v. [read post]
22 Nov 2021, 9:01 pm
NFIB v. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 9:01 pm
Mismatch 101—Basic Assertions Justice Scalia’s musings were no doubt poorly worded. [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 9:16 am
Maybe I’d put Angela Davis, If They Come in the Morning (1971) into this category. [read post]
9 Mar 2013, 8:48 am
Davis Law Rev. 101 (2013) [“Revolution”]. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 10:25 am
What we do know is that Speaker Bill Davis apparently does not have a bank account, or has not reported one, which is perhaps unsurprising for someone whose name is a conveniently untraceable alias. [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 9:05 pm
Robbins and Chevron v. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 3:54 pm
And her order is nonetheless important, and extraordinary, for several reasons.Fair Use Memorandum and Order in Sony v. [read post]
2 Jan 2020, 9:01 pm
This might explain some of what the Supreme Court said and did in the 1993 decision in Nixon v. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 5:19 am
Maybe I’d put Angela Davis, If They Come in the Morning (1971) into this category. [read post]
12 May 2019, 9:01 pm
” Critics assert, in particular, that the president seems oblivious to a 1993 Supreme Court ruling, Nixon v. [read post]
