Search for: "Department of Revenue v. United States Steel"
Results 21 - 40
of 44
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jun 2017, 8:12 am
The case is Adam Steele, et al. v. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 12:30 pm
The suit, Adam Steele, Brittany Montrois et al versus United States of America (complaint opens in Scribd), challenges the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) attempts to regulate tax preparers. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 10:30 am
The United States placed Chinese tech telecom giant Huawei on the Department of Commerce’s Entity List, which threatens its access to components from U.S. suppliers. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 10:46 am
Brief of the United States as Amicus Curiae, New York v. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 9:24 am
” 1934: Jackson becomes general counsel of the Bureau of Internal Revenue in the Treasury Department – a precursor to the Internal Revenue Service that makes Jackson the head of the largest law office in the country (larger than the Department of Justice). 1935: Jackson moves to the Securities and Exchange Commission to work on defending the constitutionality of the Public Utility Holding Company Act. 1936: Jackson becomes assistant attorney general in… [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 6:41 am
Ohio is one of only five states with a statewide gross receipts tax, but faced with declining corporate income tax revenues, other states are beginning to look to the Ohio CAT as a model. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 6:37 am
It is the finest bench, pound for pound in the United States. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 7:22 am
He serves as director at three companies—United States Steel Corp., MetLife Inc., and Lockheed Martin Corp. [read post]
22 Nov 2015, 9:01 pm
Under the existing campaign laws, as reaffirmed by Citizens United v. [read post]
10 Apr 2009, 3:14 am
The securities complaint filed on April 8 alleged that the defendants failed to disclose: (i) that the Company had engaged in anticompetitive conduct by employing a discriminatory pricing policy for raw material sales between domestic and foreign steel firms; (ii) that the Company had engaged in monopolistic conduct by fixing and maintaining coking coal prices at artificially high levels and unreasonably refusing contracts; (iii) that as the Company’s… [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 6:18 am
: Nokia Corporation v Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (PatLit) Is it safe? [read post]
12 May 2009, 12:20 pm
" In other words, could United States antitrust authorities have done more? [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 5:38 pm
The Court, in Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. [read post]
22 May 2007, 1:00 am
In Bell Atlantic v. [read post]
22 May 2007, 1:00 am
In Bell Atlantic v. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 5:25 am
Goalless draws and penalty shoot-outs - Budejovicky Budvar Narodni Podnik v Anheuser-Busch Inc (IPKat) PPL's efforts to secure via Copyright Tribunal appropriate licence fees from bars, cafes, shops and offices frustrated by Tribunal's 'one-size-fits-all' fee ruling (1709 Copyright Blog) Charity chips and dodgy patent claims - ActionAid's unsuccessful patent application (IPKat) United States US General USPTO schedules roundtable discussion on… [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 5:25 am
Goalless draws and penalty shoot-outs - Budejovicky Budvar Narodni Podnik v Anheuser-Busch Inc (IPKat) PPL's efforts to secure via Copyright Tribunal appropriate licence fees from bars, cafes, shops and offices frustrated by Tribunal's 'one-size-fits-all' fee ruling (1709 Copyright Blog) Charity chips and dodgy patent claims - ActionAid's unsuccessful patent application (IPKat) United States US General USPTO schedules roundtable discussion on… [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 6:50 am
(Laurence Kaye on Digital Media Law) United States US General David Kappos confirmed as USPTO Director (IP Watchdog) (Patently-O) (Anticipate This!) [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 7:16 pm
“The United States brought this case to protect an important body of water, Pyramid Lake,” said Ignacia S. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 6:25 am
Goalless draws and penalty shoot-outs - Budejovicky Budvar Narodni Podnik v Anheuser-Busch Inc (IPKat) PPL’s efforts to secure via Copyright Tribunal appropriate licence fees from bars, cafes, shops and offices frustrated by Tribunal’s ‘one-size-fits-all’ fee ruling (1709 Copyright Blog) Charity chips and dodgy patent claims – ActionAid’s unsuccessful patent application (IPKat) United States… [read post]
