Search for: "EEOC v. United Parcel Services, Inc."
Results 21 - 40
of 50
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Dec 2014, 8:22 am
United Parcel Service, Inc. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 1:04 pm
United Parcel Service, Inc., No. 16-2132, 2017 U.S. [read post]
1 Jan 2015, 9:00 am
And in EEOC v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 10:06 am
United Parcel Service, Inc. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 5:53 pm
United Parcel Service, Inc., No. 12-1226, which involves the extent to which employers must provide pregnant employees work accommodations provided to other non-pregnant workers with work limitations under the PDA. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 9:01 pm
United Parcel Service, federal courts around the country have been grappling with the proper treatment of accommodation claims. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 7:15 am
United Parcel Service 12-1226Issue: Whether, and in what circumstances, the Pregnancy Discrimination Act, 42 U.S.C. [read post]
6 Sep 2017, 6:47 am
United Parcel Service, Inc., case. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 4:33 am
On October 2nd, the Supreme Court granted cert. in a Title VII religious accommodation case, EEOC v. [read post]
6 Feb 2016, 12:00 am
Region 10 Education Service Center).Associational discrimination – disability. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 7:13 am
United Parcel Service, Inc., No. 12-1226, which poses whether the Pregnancy Discrimination Act requires an employer to accommodate a pregnant woman with work restrictions related to pregnancy in the same manner as it accommodates a non-pregnant employee with the same restrictions, but not related to pregnancy. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 7:13 am
United Parcel Service, Inc., No. 12-1226, which poses whether the Pregnancy Discrimination Act requires an employer to accommodate a pregnant woman with work restrictions related to pregnancy in the same manner as it accommodates a non-pregnant employee with the same restrictions, but not related to pregnancy. [read post]
28 Apr 2025, 3:30 am
United Parcel Service, Inc. (2015). [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 8:43 am
United Parcel Service, 86 F.3d 196 (11th Cir. 1996). [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 8:43 am
United Parcel Service, 86 F.3d 196 (11th Cir. 1996). [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 8:36 am
United Parcel Service, 12-1226, involves a UPS employee who was not permitted to return to work when pregnant because her doctor said she should not lift objects over twenty pounds. [read post]
18 Mar 2025, 3:50 am
United Parcel Service, Inc., 527 U.S. 516 (1999) The Court found that an individual with high blood pressure controlled by medication was not disabled because the condition, when medicated, did not substantially limit a major life activity. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 4:00 am
United Parcel Service, Inc. suggested that the answer is yes. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 11:43 am
Well, Amgen Inc. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 3:27 am
United Parcel Service, No. 08-60448 (5th Cir. [read post]
