Search for: "EX PARTE MARK SMITH " Results 21 - 40 of 313
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jul 2012, 8:41 am
Securities Fraud Our securities attorneys at Shepherd Smith Edwards and Kantas represent investors throughout the US. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 8:12 am by Ron Pollock
Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) Practices: This bill retains existing ex parte reexamination, adds preissuance submissions by third parties,  and adds post-grant review. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 8:12 am by Joseph Falcon
Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) Practices: This bill retains existing ex parte reexamination, adds preissuance submissions by third parties,  and adds post-grant review. [read post]
11 Sep 2011, 9:43 am by Vincent LoTempio
The Leahy-Smith "America Invents Act" H.R. 1249, was passed by the U.S. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 3:40 am by John L. Welch
"Essentially, this would amount to substituting the examining attorney’s determination, based on the limited record adduced during ex parte examination, in lieu of a more expansive record that may be shown in an inter partes proceeding." [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 3:10 pm by Tom Smith
Fines and other criminal penalties mark the boundaries of markets rather than being part of the market themselves. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 5:09 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Regardless of party, Skurka's part of what from the outside appears to be a longstanding office culture of concealing exculpatory evidence from defense counsel. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 2:30 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
In Smith’s idea, bad faith/fraudlike behavior is a precondition to entering into the equitable realm, not part of a multifactor test. [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 8:36 am by Steve Baird
OK, there is one exception, but it’s understandable: Barney Google and Snuffy Smith for a cartoon series. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 8:39 am
Another benefit of combining forces may be for the group (if regulatory burdens became overwhelming) to employ a part time ex-solicitor working from home to develop expertise in money laundering, SRA rules etc. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 10:55 am
PART 1 | Untangling jurisdiction under the Design and Brussels Regulations: should I stay or...? [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 11:22 am by Dennis Crouch
[Rule 131 declarations are ex parte, uncontested, and often inadequately examined, so they rarely survive litigation challenges and easily raise inequitable conduct issues.] 3. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 6:01 pm by MOTP
Aug. 23, 2007) (Fitzwater, J.)).IIIThe court begins with Moss's argument that it is entitled to summary judgment because Smith lacks Article III standing.AThe standing doctrine addresses the question of who may properly bring suit in federal court, and "is an essential and unchanging part of the case-or-controversy requirement of Article III. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 7:31 am
 This is part one…* UPC Mock Trial - a Kat reports from Paris - Part deux… and this is part two -- pardon, deux.* Posh wash or Porsche? [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 9:54 am by Orin Kerr
Ct. at 956 (Sotomayor, J., concurring) (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]