Search for: "Estee Lauder" Results 21 - 40 of 111
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jun 2019, 10:08 am by Sahara Pynes
As we discussed here, this lawsuit, and the one against Estee Lauder that settled last year, shed light on the importance of treating new parents equally in the workplace, regardless of their sex. [read post]
6 May 2019, 7:55 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Estee Lauder Companies, Inc., 797 F.3d 1248 (11th Cir. 2015), held that a plaintiff could assert a claim for contributory false advertising, analogizing to contributory trademark infrignement. [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 5:46 am by Charla Bizios Stevens
Estée Lauder has implemented a revised parental leave policy which provides all eligible employees, regardless of gender or care¬giver status, the same 20 weeks of paid leave for child bonding and the same six-week flexibility for returning to work. [read post]
15 Jun 2018, 2:15 pm
The EEOC announced a lawsuit against Estee Lauder, noting that equal benefits for equal work “applies to men as well as women. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 12:30 pm by Charla Bizios Stevens
Estee Lauder’s parental leave program, adopted in 2013, was implemented in order to provide employees with paid leave for purposes of bonding with a new child, as well as flexible return to work benefits at the conclusion of the bonding leave. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 4:32 am by Jon Hyman
— via FisherBroyles What Does the EEOC’s Lawsuit Against Estee Lauder Mean for Parental Leave Policies? [read post]
10 Sep 2017, 2:36 pm by Sahara Pynes
If the EEOC’s recent lawsuit against Estee Lauder is any indication of things to come, now is a good time to review your parental leave policy. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 3:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
By apple-to-apples, I mean — Actually, I’ll let the EEOC explain: JP Morgan, Estee Lauder, they say bad news comes in threes. [read post]
30 Aug 2017, 2:48 pm by Bloomberg
  Estee Lauder Companies Inc., one of the world’s largest cosmetics firms, is being sued by federal regulators for discriminating against men. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 5:47 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Estee Lauder Companies, Inc., 797 F.3d 1248 (11th Cir. 2015), recognizing such a claim.http://tushnet.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default? [read post]
20 Jan 2017, 5:57 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The judgement also denied equitable distribution of the Plaintiff’s Estee Lauder stock option, and was ordered to pay assessed arrears in the amount of $107K. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 7:37 am by Ron Coleman
  Moderator: Olivera Medenica, Medenica Law PLLC Rita Odin, Vice President and Senior Trademark Counsel, The Estee Lauder Companies Inc. [read post]