Search for: "Ezell v. State" Results 21 - 40 of 49
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jun 2010, 4:50 am by SHG
United States, 128 S. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 4:05 pm
  To them, the majority ignored a bedrock principle of bankruptcy law, which Justice Alito most recently reiterated in Travelers v. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 9:50 am by Alan Gura
Five years after the Seventh Circuit’s decision striking down the range ban in Ezell v. [read post]
11 Feb 2025, 2:34 pm by Josh Richman
The complaint by EFF, Lex Lumina LLP, State Democracy Defenders Fund, and The Chandra Law Firm argues that OPM and OPM Acting Director Charles Ezell illegally disclosed personnel records to Musk’s DOGE in violation of the federal Privacy Act of 1974. [read post]
3 Jul 2007, 10:52 am
The court states that the majority position is mistaken that section 506 is the only source of authority for a deficiency and that per Butner v. [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 12:54 pm by Randee Iles and Rebecca Guidry
 In their brief, the Defendants cite the following quote from the United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit case of Archbold-Garrett v. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 3:49 pm by Stephen Bilkis
(Heller v District of Columbia ["Heller II"], 698 F Supp 2d 179 [D DC 2010]; Ezell v City of Chicago, — F Supp 2d —, 2010 WL 3998104 [ND Ill 2010]).4 Page 4 Penal Law §§ 265.01 and 400.005 Penal Law § 265.01(1) states, in relevant part, that a "person is guilty of criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree when: (1) [h]e possesses any firearm. [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm by Leslie C. Griffin
Kevin Ezell, president of NAMB, to discuss a new SPA. [read post]
And, as Judge Sykes recently explained in analogizing the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms to the First Amendment right of free expression in Ezell v. [read post]
19 May 2011, 8:36 am by David Oscar Markus
The 11th Circuit's en banc decision today in Gilbert v. [read post]
11 Mar 2025, 6:24 pm by Stephen Halbrook
  That's why, for instance, shooting ranges have Second Amendment protection, as Ezell v. [read post]