Search for: "Federal EEO and Civil Rights Executives" Results 21 - 40 of 134
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jul 2016, 5:55 am by Jamie LaPlante
The Final Rule reflects current case law interpretations of “because of sex” from Title VII of the Civil Rights Act. [read post]
9 Apr 2007, 10:00 am
The decision is relevant to non-civil service employees, including congressional employees and employees of the Executive Office of the President. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 11:28 am by Wally Zimolong
  It was signed during the Civil Rights Era when institutional racism was a reality. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 12:07 pm
Moore Federal Appellate Court Decisions Paul Mollica's Daily Developments in EEO Law here1st Circuit Casamento v. [read post]
30 Aug 2017, 9:10 am by Federal Employment Law Insider
Altitude Express Inc., challenging the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission’s (EEOC) position that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 covers sexual orientation. [read post]
17 May 2015, 3:53 pm by New Mexico Employment Law Letter
  Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 has always prohibited discrimination, harassment, and retaliation “because of sex” and “on the basis of sex. [read post]
 President Biden’s Executive Order (EO), issued on September 9, generally requires certain companies that enter into new, extended, or renewed federal contracts after October 15, 2021, to mandate COVID-19 vaccinations for their employees. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 1:36 pm by Lev Sugarman
Familiarity with U.S. governmental institutions and U.S. and international law related to national security and human rights. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 2:26 pm by Lev Sugarman
Familiarity with U.S. governmental institutions and U.S. and international law related to national security and human rights. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 4:26 am by info
These violations can cause costly lawsuits, and also civil and criminal penalties. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 8:03 am by Joy Waltemath
Trump administration news Parts of Trump executive orders reducing federal employee collective bargaining rights declared invalid by D.D.C. [read post]
6 Aug 2021, 4:06 am by Scott Bomboy
Federal EEO laws do not prevent an employer from requiring all employees physically entering the workplace to be vaccinated for COVID-19, so long as employers comply with the reasonable accommodation provisions of the ADA and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and other EEO considerations,” the commission said in a statement. [read post]
6 Dec 2015, 9:54 pm by Cody M. Poplin
Will represent the Agency in all aspects of litigation before the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) on matters arising under federal statutes, including, but not limited to, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, and other laws administered by the EEOC; including preparing pleadings, conducting and defending depositions, engaging in discovery, and representing the agency in court proceedings. [read post]
10 May 2019, 2:00 am by Tammy Binford
Agency Agenda Now that the agency has a quorum again, it will be able to more meaningfully tackle issues going before the commission, such as whether Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 protects LGBTQ individuals from discrimination in the workplace and uncertainty surrounding collection of compensation and hours-worked data for the annual EEO-1 reports required of certain employers. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 5:43 am by Jon Hyman
It heard testimony from representatives of the National Consumer Law Center, Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, the National Council of Negro Women, the U.S. [read post]
Department of Justice’s (DOJ) memorandum reversing its position under the Obama administration that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits discrimination based on sexual orientation; The NLRB’s reversal of four major decisions days before acting chair Philip Miscimarra’s term ended; and The rescission of the Fair Pay and Safe Workplaces Executive Order (known as the blacklisting Executive Order) through the Congressional Review Act. [read post]
Department of Justice’s (DOJ) memorandum reversing its position under the Obama administration that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits discrimination based on sexual orientation; The NLRB’s reversal of four major decisions days before acting chair Philip Miscimarra’s term ended; and The rescission of the Fair Pay and Safe Workplaces Executive Order (known as the blacklisting Executive Order) through the Congressional Review Act. [read post]