Search for: "Finkelstein v Finkelstein"
Results 21 - 40
of 128
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Aug 2019, 2:58 am
Fitzgerald, Finger Lakes Times] “Finkelstein has gone on a lawsuit-filing spree since getting his law license back in New York state in 2016,” and among his 50 ADA suits are some the named plaintiff says he didn’t know about [Julia Marsh, New York Post] In EEOC-land no one can hear you honk [press release on EEOC lawsuit against limo service that declined to hire deaf driver] “Washington Supreme Court Says Obesity Is a Disability” [Ben McDonald, and thanks… [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 7:51 am
Co. v Batista, 165 AD3d 997, 998; Doviak v Finkelstein &Partners, LLP, 90 AD3d 696, 699; Quinn v Walsh, 18 AD3d 638; Brill v Friends World Coll., 133 AD2d 729). [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 3:32 am
Co. v Batista, 165 AD3d 997, 998; Doviak v Finkelstein & Partners, LLP, 90 AD3d 696, 699; Quinn v Walsh, 18 AD3d 638; Brill v Friends World Coll., 133 AD2d 729). [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 3:51 am
New York’s Position on Frozen Embryos and Divorce The most recent New York case dealing with frozen embryos and divorce is Finkelstein v. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 3:16 am
Under this extremely liberal standard, “any doubts are to be resolved in favor of pertinence” (Flomenhaft v Finkelstein, 127 AD3d 634 [1st Dept 2015]). [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 7:49 am
Facts: This case (Michel v. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 7:32 pm
Finkelstein, Basic Concepts of Probability and Statistics in the Law 86-87 (2009) (criticizing the blatantly incorrect interpretation of confidence intervals by the Brock court). 2 Zach Hughes, “The Legal Significance of Statistical Significance,” 28 Westlaw Journal: Pharmaceutical 1, 2 (Mar. 2012). 3 See Norman E. [read post]
16 Sep 2018, 3:15 am
CJEU reiterates Universal Music in Löber v Barclays. https://t.co/SDxarBKl3x 2018-09-14 E-signatures can prove conclusion of data processing agreements https://t.co/UvxcuuNhjn 2018-09-14 Supreme Court reverses FCA in Rogers v Voltage copyright case https://t.co/lKKSTV1Ez2 2018-09-14 ISPs fees for complying with Norwich orders: Rogers v Voltage https://t.co/70wbISUueq 2018-09-14 ISPs fees for complying with Norwich orders: Rogers v Voltage… [read post]
5 Aug 2018, 9:01 pm
In its June, 2018 decision in Finkelstein v. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 4:18 am
See Bridget M v. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 8:19 am
v=g44TIJdBrGU [read post]
29 Jul 2017, 12:34 pm
Karlo v. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 4:00 am
Finkelstein v Ontario (Securities Commission), 2016 ONSC 7508 [174] The Panel noted that, while Finkelstein may not have personally benefitted from his conduct, the participants in the three instances of insider trading/tipping, earned profits of approximately $2 million. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 5:57 am
Here are the leading legal headlines from Wise Law on Twitter:Harper government names a slew of new federal judges, but none for Ontario despite 31 vacanciesThe evolution of fraudulent conveyance – Indcondo v. [read post]
16 Nov 2014, 6:00 am
The Supreme Court released a landmark decision earlier this week in the case Bhasin v. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 9:55 pm
(See Luzano v. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 8:01 am
”Jackson v. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 6:04 am
Two US Courts Permit Defendants To Be Served on FacebookBring your gun, get a discount: Louisiana restaurant’s promotion sparks criticismKnow the LSUC Rules of Professional Conduct: changes are comingCRTC to Netflix: Since you won't co-operate, we'll ignore you Sun Media apologizes to Justin Trudeau California enacts strict student privacy law Ruth Bader Ginsburg: If Roe v. [read post]
8 Jun 2014, 7:53 pm
The law is clear that scientific certainty is not required to prove causation to the legal standard of proof on a balance of probabilities (See: Snell v. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 1:27 pm
__________ The Case Opinion:Great Hill Equity Partners IV, LP v. [read post]
