Search for: "Finkelstein v. State" Results 21 - 40 of 69
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Mar 2022, 3:28 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
NAC was found liable on a breach of contract claim in an underlying action against it in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 5:30 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Here, the defendants demonstrated, prima facie, that the acts that they allegedly failed to perform were beyond the scope of the engagement letter, which was prepared by the defendants and signed by the plaintiff (see AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d at 435; DeNatale v Santangelo, 65 AD3d 1006, 1007; Turner v Irving Finkelstein & Meirowitz, LLP, 61 AD3d 849, 850). [read post]
7 Nov 2007, 12:16 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKIntellectual Property Dismissal of Patent Coinventorship Claim Over Cut Diamond's Design Not Reconsidered Finkelstein v. [read post]
20 Jun 2022, 3:11 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
NAC was found liable on a breach of contract claim in an underlying action against it in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. [read post]
23 Aug 2019, 2:58 am by Walter Olson
Fitzgerald, Finger Lakes Times] “Finkelstein has gone on a lawsuit-filing spree since getting his law license back in New York state in 2016,” and among his 50 ADA suits are some the named plaintiff says he didn’t know about [Julia Marsh, New York Post] In EEOC-land no one can hear you honk [press release on EEOC lawsuit against limo service that declined to hire deaf driver] “Washington Supreme Court Says Obesity Is a Disability” [Ben McDonald, and… [read post]
11 Apr 2007, 10:00 am
”  The Court of Appeals recently reiterated that sentiment in Thyroff v. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 3:32 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Co. v Batista, 165 AD3d 997, 998; Doviak v Finkelstein & Partners, LLP, 90 AD3d 696, 699; Quinn v Walsh, 18 AD3d 638; Brill v Friends World Coll., 133 AD2d 729). [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 7:51 am by Dan Bressler
Co. v Batista, 165 AD3d 997, 998; Doviak v Finkelstein &Partners, LLP, 90 AD3d 696, 699; Quinn v Walsh, 18 AD3d 638; Brill v Friends World Coll., 133 AD2d 729). [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 6:25 am
Finkelstein, 299 N.Y. 70 (1949), wherein our state's highest court -- the New York State Court of Appeals -- noted as follows:'Substantial' is a word of general reference which takes on color and precision from its total context. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 2:50 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
See also, Alvarez v Snyder, 264 AD2d 27 (1st Dept 2000), Iv denied 95 NY2d 759, cert denied sub nom Dim v Snyder, 531 US 1158 (2001); Finkelstein v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 3:04 am by Rosalind English
 In Australia, the Finkelstein inquiry published earlier this month has recommended the establishment of a government-funded “News Media Council” to set and enforce journalistic standards. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 6:27 am by Richard Hunt
Finally, any municipal or state agency re [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 3:51 am by Cari Rincker
New York’s Position on Frozen Embryos and Divorce The most recent New York case dealing with frozen embryos and divorce is Finkelstein v. [read post]