Search for: "G Merrell" Results 21 - 40 of 44
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jun 2013, 12:13 pm by Schachtman
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 911 F.2d 941, 948 (3d Cir. 1990). [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 3:18 pm by John J. Sullivan
  Plaintiffs argued that the federal issue wasn’t substantial enough to warrant removal, citing Merrell Dow Pharmas. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2012, 9:14 am by Schachtman
Merrell Dow Pharms., Inc., 874 F.2d 307, 312 , modified on reh’g, 884 F.2d 166 (5th Cir. 1989)). [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 4:07 pm by Schachtman
The discovery of expert witnesses who have conducted statistical analyses poses difficult problems for lawyers. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 12:12 am by Eugene Volokh
Before the hearing, the Government provided Defendants with a longer, more concrete Rule 16(a)(1)(G) summary of Dr. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 9:36 am by Schachtman
With the exception of a few evidence scholars, Federal Rule of Evidence 703 is ignored or misunderstood in practice. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 1:24 pm by Roy Ginsburg
[Readers:  Set forth below is a thoughtful and detailed analysis of the Supreme Court's decision of Walmart v. [read post]
16 May 2011, 8:08 pm by The Legal Blog
Justice KG BalakrishnanThe Supreme Court in Selvi & Ors. v State of Karnataka has examined the law relating to the involuntary administration of certain scientific techniques, namely narcoanalysis, polygraph examination and the Brain Electrical Activation Profile (BEAP) test for the purpose of improving investigation efforts in criminal cases. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm by Bexis
By now Restatement (Second) of Torts §402A (1965) is so old as to be thought of as somewhat antediluvian. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 8:57 pm
Cir. 2009) ("Because Lonza sought to introduce the testimony of an alleged prior inventor under § 102(g) for the purpose of invalidating a patent, Lonza was required to produce evidence corroborating Dr. [read post]