Search for: "GENERAL ELECTRIC CO v. USA"
Results 21 - 40
of 129
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2015, 7:57 pm
Clearly, there are some cases, like General Electric v. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 2:27 am
United Food Import (TTABlog) TTAB precedential no. 49: Following first Niagara, TTAB rules that foreign owner sufficiently pleaded use of mark in USA: Petróleos Mexicanos v. [read post]
5 Nov 2012, 11:17 am
Teva Pharmas., USA, Inc., 2012 WL 5364392 (M.D. [read post]
23 Sep 2017, 12:39 pm
USA, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 8:58 am
EPA and West Virginia v. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 9:30 am
Philip Morris USA Inc., 787 F. [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 7:56 am
Electric Co. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 10:06 am
Warner Electric Brake & Clutch Co, 605 N.E.2d 1032 (Ill. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., 2010 WL 2640170, at *2 (W.D. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 10:24 am
Cir. 2002), citing Tualatin Electric v. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 4:01 am
American Electric Power Co. v. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 10:45 pm
LLC (Patently-O) CAFC affirms claim construction using comparative language: Funai Electric Company v. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 12:15 pm
American Electric Power Co., et al., 582 F.3d 309 (2d Cir. 2009) and Comer v. [read post]
30 May 2011, 4:55 am
Kim Laube & Co (Docket Report) District Court N D Illinois: Patent assignor estoppel is limited to the assignee: Schultz v. iGPS Co. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 12:30 pm
Generally, articles are included if either the lead author or at least half of the co-authors are based in the GS. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 5:25 am
Medico (Filewrapper) BPAI finds claim indefinite and not directed to patentable subject under Bilski: Ex parte Hemmat (GRAY On Claims) District Court N D Illinois: KSR obviousness does not require prior art from the same field: Se-Kure Controls, Inc v Diam USA, Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) District Court E D Texas finds plaintiff has standing; agreement transfers ownership and simultaneously a conditional purchase by transferor from transferee: Balsam Coffee… [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 5:25 am
Medico (Filewrapper) BPAI finds claim indefinite and not directed to patentable subject under Bilski: Ex parte Hemmat (GRAY On Claims) District Court N D Illinois: KSR obviousness does not require prior art from the same field: Se-Kure Controls, Inc v Diam USA, Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) District Court E D Texas finds plaintiff has standing; agreement transfers ownership and simultaneously a conditional purchase by transferor from transferee: Balsam Coffee… [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
Volkswagon-based transfer mandamus order in In re TS Tech USA (Inventive Step) (Hal Wegner) (EDTexweblog.com) (EDTexweblog.com) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Patently-O) (Law360) (Patent Prospector) ECJ decides Obelix too famous to be confused with MOBILIX mobile phone service: Les Éditions Albert René Sàrl v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market, Orange A/S (Class 46) (IPKat) Global Global – General… [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 5:51 am
– America-Israel Patent Law) Accelerated examination (Inventive Step) Suggestions for USPTO Director David Kappos (IP Watchdog) Mystery graph of the day (Patently-O) The crisis in the American patent system (CanadaPatentBlog) US Patents – Decisions CAFC debates stays pending re-examination; Injunctions when claims are of ‘suspect validity’: Fresenius USA, Inc v Baxter International, Inc (Patently-O) (IP Law Observer) (Gray on… [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 2:05 am
(PatLit) Judgment of similarity of designs in China (Class 99) Denmark When toilet seats make impressions on their users: Duravit AG v B&N Developing ApS (Class 99) Europe European patent – Further steps to enhanced cooperation (EPLAW) (IPJUR) (IPKat) (inovia) (IAM) General Court: More absolute grounds: KOMPRESSOR PLUS (Class 46) General Court confirms likelihood of confusion: Bianchin v OHMI – Grotto (GASOLINE) (Class 46) General Court… [read post]
