Search for: "Harding v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc."
Results 21 - 40
of 92
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jun 2017, 5:19 am
One of the tables had a sticker showing it was sold by Wal-Mart for $247. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 11:41 am
Wal Mart Stores Inc., 691 F.3d 527 (3d Cir. 2012); Myers v. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 5:17 am
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (2012) the employee was a certified medical marijuana user. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 6:40 am
The decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 2:52 pm
The minor change made in the last sentence of the opinion’s disposition clarified that: (1) Respondents (City of Ceres and Real Party Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., et al.) were awarded costs as prevailing parties in the merits appeal, which affirmed the trial court’s judgment denying the writ petition challenging the EIR, statement of overriding considerations, and approval of Wal-Mart’s controversial Ceres project; and (2)… [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 1:46 pm
If class actions are the exception (see Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 1:46 pm
If class actions are the exception (see Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 6:13 am
Paleteria La Michoacana, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 10:11 am
The Court did not swear at all by Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 9:01 am
Doubling down on the point, the Court emphasized that its 2011 decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 5:29 pm
For example, in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 1:14 pm
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 725 F.3d 349, 355 (3d Cir. 2013), and Carrera, the Third Circuit established a two-part test for ascertainability: (1) the class must be defined with reference to objective criteria, and (2) there must be a reliable and administratively feasible mechanism for determining whether putative class members fall within the class definition. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 1:14 pm
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 725 F.3d 349, 355 (3d Cir. 2013), and Carrera, the Third Circuit established a two-part test for ascertainability: (1) the class must be defined with reference to objective criteria, and (2) there must be a reliable and administratively feasible mechanism for determining whether putative class members fall within the class definition. [read post]
26 Nov 2015, 7:53 pm
Childers, 982 So.2d 36 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008); Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 12:10 pm
One wonders how this invitation to certify now and decertify later when more evidence is in satisfies the Supreme Court’s view that Rule 23(b)(3) “requires the judge to make findings about predominance and superiority before allow allowing the class,” Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 6:50 am
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., South Florida Injury Lawyer Blawg, June 18, 2015 Injuries at Amusement Parks in Florida, South Florida Injury Lawyer Blawg, June 10, 2015 [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 9:29 am
Braun, 14-1123, and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 11:57 am
The Eighth Circuit, in a 2:1 decision, upheld that verdict, rejecting arguments by the employer that (1) the case should never have been certified given differences in time spent among the class; (2) the use of statistics was improper and constituted “Trial by Formula” in violation of the teachings of Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 7:32 am
Braun, 14-1123, and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2014, 9:45 am
Bone/Wal-Mart on error costs: source identification is expensive to determine, which I think the paper is clear about in struggling w/solutions. [read post]
