Search for: "Hodgkins v. State"
Results 21 - 40
of 65
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Oct 2018, 11:14 am
” Although finding that this standard had been met, Bolanos determined that the putative damages in this matter violated the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment as observed by the US Supreme Court in State Farm v. [read post]
20 Oct 2018, 8:50 am
The trial court, in Ruff v. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 12:48 pm
The August 10, 2018, verdict in Johnson v. [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 8:59 am
DEWAYNE JOHNSON V. [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 8:16 am
Dewayne Johnson v. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 10:04 am
, v. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 12:37 pm
, v. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 5:57 pm
Genzyme Corp. v. [read post]
26 Nov 2017, 5:39 pm
Department of Revenue and Quill v. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 3:24 am
In Graham v. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 7:36 am
Consequently, the Eighth Circuit affirmed summary judgment against her ADA and state law discrimination and retaliation claims (Oehmke v. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 12:09 pm
Carias v. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 4:00 am
”Nizamuddeen filed a complaint with the New York State Division of Human Rights [SDHR] alleging that MTA terminated his employment because of his disability in violation of Executive Law Article 15, New York State’s Human Rights Law. [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 4:49 pm
In that State, Dank had plied his wares at the Cronulla Football Club in 2011. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 4:28 pm
On the same day Sir David Eady handed down judgment in Wasserman v Freilich. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 9:24 am
In Hodgkins v. [read post]
22 May 2015, 12:26 pm
They include: (1) Nonnon v City of New York;2 (2) Simpson v City of New York;3 (3) Irizarry v City of New York;4 (4) Carollo v City of New York;5 (5) Walsh v City of New York;6 (6) Arisio v City of New York;7 (7) Parmigiano v City of New York;8 (8) Phillips v City of New York;9 and (9) Nessen v City of New York.10 There were 29 plaintiffs in the original nine actions. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 1:32 pm
The motion court denied the City's motions for summary judgment in all nine actions, stating that in the instant motion, the City raises no new facts or law to warrant a departure from the prior holding of the Appellate Division, First Department in NonnonI. [read post]
5 Apr 2015, 1:41 pm
As the Court of Appeals stated in People v. [read post]
28 Mar 2015, 1:41 pm
On a previous appeal, affirming the denial of defendants' motions to dismiss, inter alia, for failure to state a cause of action, we determined that plaintiffs' expert evidence did not require that a hearing be held in accordance with Frye v. [read post]
