Search for: "IN RE J R JONES MINOR" Results 21 - 40 of 47
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 May 2024, 11:38 am by INFORRM
On 24 May 2024 judgment on meaning was handed down by HHJ Lewis in Unity Plus Healthcare Ltd v Clay & Ors (Re Preliminary Issues) [2024] EWHC 1278 (KB). [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 8:30 am by Eugene Volokh
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit had held (In re Tam), by a 9-to-3 vote, that the exclusion of “disparaging” marks violated the First Amendment. [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 2:50 pm by Eugene Volokh
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held (In re Tam), by a 9-to-3 vote, that this exclusion of “disparaging” marks violated the First Amendment. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 8:59 am by Barry Sookman
For example, the US Congress,[2] the European Union[3] and its member states including the UK[4] and Ireland,[5] Australia[6] and others have been re-examining their copyright laws in light of the challenges posed by digital technologies. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:15 am by Steve Lombardi
Jones, 298 N.W.2d 296, 298 (Iowa 1980). [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 11:14 am by Eugene Volokh
[R]egulating the casting process necessarily regulates the end product. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 2:13 pm by Adam Thierer
We’re releasing these as we get ready to submit a big filing in the FCC’s “Future of Media” proceeding (deadline is May 7th). [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
If you’re the Tuscaloosa Police Department (TPD), you might suddenly start giving her poor evaluations, refer to her behind her back with gendered slurs, or tell her could just patrol the streets without a bullet-proof vest if the assigned one could not be used while she was lactating. [read post]