Search for: "IN RE THE RULES FOR ADMISSION TO TH" Results 21 - 40 of 46
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jan 2012, 9:40 am by Ed Wallis
Robinson, Sr., & Jeff Mobley, Pritchard on the Law of Wills and the Administration of Estates § 124, at 203 (5 ed. th 1994). [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 5:56 am
The Government also contends that the Law School Evidence may be admissible for purposes of impeachment under Rule 608(b) of the Federal Rules of Evidence. . . . [read post]
15 Sep 2021, 5:14 am by Russell Knight
If of a type reasonably relied upon by experts in the particular field in forming opinions or inferences upon the subject, the facts or data need not be admissible in evidence. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 6:39 am by Roel van Woudenberg
With communication of 11 December 2008 the Receiving Section issued a noting of loss of rights pursuant to Rule 112(1) EPC in respect of European application No. 05 858 797.3, informing the original applicant that the application was deemed to be withdrawn (Rule 160(1) EPC) for non-performance of the acts required by Rule 159(1) EPC for entry into the European phase.VI. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 11:43 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
And, of the testimony:The district court excluded Thomas’s testimony re- garding his prior use of the claimed invention as uncor- roborated in light of the “general rule” that “corroboration of oral testimony regarding prior invention or use is required before the evidence is admissible. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 3:21 pm
  Once jurisdiction is established by motion, the trial court has to rule on the motion within 60 days from the mailing or service of notice of judgment or, if no notice was given, within 60 days after the notice of intention to move for a new trial. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 9:11 am by John Elwood
You’ll be as happy as we are that we’re done with Relist Watch until November. [read post]
2 Sep 2023, 3:29 pm by Russell Knight
Evid. 801 “Hearsay is not admissible except as provided by these rules, by other rules prescribed by the Supreme Court, or by statute as provided in Rule 101. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 7:05 pm by Mary Dwyer
Douglas 13-191Issue: Whether the Due Process Clause is violated by the Florida Supreme Court’s new rule of preclusion, which permits Engle v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 8:26 am by admin
“Until he does, we’re not going to have anything to say about a project that does not e [read post]
7 Nov 2024, 8:19 am by John Elwood
The support plan states that “[s]chool staff, family, and the student should work together to complete th[e] document. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 11:52 am
Williams, No. 06-3620 Conviction for armed robbery and possession of a firearm during a crime of violence is affirmed where the district judge did not err in ruling that the testimony of eyewitnesses would be admissible at trial since a lineup in which the eyewitnesses identified the defendant was not flawed in any way that would lead to irreparable misidentification. [read post]
26 May 2015, 7:42 am
  So far many plaintiffs have had trouble coming up with factual support to back such allegations – and sometimes we’re not even sure why they’re making them. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 1:18 pm by John Elwood
It’s been a fun ride, but we’re becoming increasingly aware that our profligate use of electrons cannot continue indefinitely. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 4:13 am by Bernard Bell
Bank Securities Litigation, 478 F.Supp. 577 (E.D.N.Y. 1979); accord, In re Sealed Case, 121 F.3d at 738 )(shielding internal government deliberations in th[e] context [of governmental misconduct] does not serve “the public’s interest in honest, effective government. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 4:44 am by Steve McConnell
As it was, Posner stuck to the lex loci delicti presumption, because any other rule would facilitate forum-shopping. [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 9:10 am by Schachtman
Downing itself lays down a flexible rule. [read post]