Search for: "In Re: Rules Governing Admission to The Mississippi Bar"
Results 21 - 34
of 34
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Feb 2014, 3:35 pm
Studies, whether they have statistically significant results, or not, are rarely admissible in evidence. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 8:49 am
Horse Slaughter: The House and Senate Agriculture Appropriations bills include identical language barring the U.S. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 6:33 am
We’re pressing to have the horse slaughter provision sustained in the omnibus bill that Congress plans to act on by January 15 to avoid another government shutdown. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
The learned intermediary rule could be Bob Dylan (I know, we’re showing our age, here). [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 6:53 pm
On the other hand, members of the House of Representatives answer to the people of their district, and do so often, standing for re-election on short cycles (Art. [read post]
5 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
" (Class actions are a little different and are governed by different rules. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 5:00 am
” So we’re not dealing with a manufacturing defect claim. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 6:47 pm
In favor of the Condemned Ex parte Kenneth Eugene Billups (In re: Kenneth Eugene Billups v. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 7:05 am
The government is now cracking down. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 12:47 pm
Bucky Askew, Consultant on Legal Education, American Bar Association; Mr. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 4:58 am
In re: Welding Fume Products Liability Litigation, MDL No. 1535 (N.D. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 1:26 pm
Mississippi is procedurally defaulted; 3) defendant's counsel was not ineffective for failing to object to the penalty instructions; and 4) a state court's analysis under Beck was reasonable as it is well established that a lesser-included offense instruction is not required where the facts of a murder so strongly indicate intent to kill that the jury could not rationally have a reasonable doubt as to the defendant'! [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 1:26 pm
Mississippi is procedurally defaulted; 3) defendant's counsel was not ineffective for failing to object to the penalty instructions; and 4) a state court's analysis under Beck was reasonable as it is well established that a lesser-included offense instruction is not required where the facts of a murder so strongly indicate intent to kill that the jury could not rationally have a reasonable doubt as to the defendant'! [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 2:47 am
DeGennaro, No. 06-4195 Order holding that retrial of defendants would not violate the Double Jeopardy Clause and denying motions to bar retrial and dismiss the indictment is reversed where: 1) the decision of the trial court that there was "manifest necessity" to declare a mistrial was an abuse of discretion; and 2) a statement by counsel in support of a motion for mistrial, quickly reconsidered, does not preclude the defendant from claiming that the Double Jeopardy Clause… [read post]
