Search for: "In Re Amendment of Rule 3" Results 21 - 40 of 9,762
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Oct 2015, 5:29 am by Schachtman
In re Paoli RR Yard PCB Litig., 35 F.3d 717, 745 (3d Cir. 1994). [read post]
16 Nov 2018, 8:05 am by Kish Law
OK, here’s my second post on the annual amendments to the Federal Sentencing Guidelines, rules that govern imposition of a criminal sentence in all federal courts from Alanta to Alaska, from Maine to Moultrie (way down in South GA, look it up if you’re not familiar with it). [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 10:32 am by Roger Parloff
Counting last week’s Cawthorn ruling, Section 3 challenges have now generated two state and three federal judicial rulings—the first opinions on Section 3 in a century and a half. [read post]
8 May 2020, 3:47 am by Schachtman
Capra, Reporter’s Memorandum re Forensic Evidence, Daubert and Rule 702 at 52 (April 1, 2018) (“[T]he fact remains that some courts are ignoring the requirements of Rule 702(b) and (d). [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 3:08 am by Liz Dunshee
The rules were adopted by a 3-1 vote, with Commissioner Allison Herren Lee issuing this dissenting statement. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
” If a majority of the justices want to hold otherwise and conclude that the First Amendment is “un-rule-y,” they need a very good reason for doing so. [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 3:32 am by Liz Dunshee
Yesterday, the SEC announced this 98-page release to re-propose amendments to Reg M that would remove the references to credit rating agencies from existing exceptions provided in Rule 101 and Rule 102. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 3:00 am by John Jenkins
On Friday, the SEC announced amendments to the auditor independence requirements set forth in Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 6:22 am
” The group asked the SEC to re-open the comment period so that the public could comment on the new data. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 4:00 am by Betty Lupinacci
Res 40 (1909).) before it was sent to the states to be ratified. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 1:01 am by FHH Law
In April we reported on the adoption of new service rules for 65 MHz of re-purposed spectrum in the 1695-1710 MHz, 1755-1780 MHz, and 2155-2180 MHz bands to be used for Advanced Wireless Services (AWS-3). [read post]
On November 5, 2013, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission proposed rules to establish new position limits that would apply to 28 agricultural, energy and metals futures contracts, and swaps, futures and options that are economically equivalent to those contracts. [1] Once adopted, the proposal would reinstate, with certain changes, the position limit rules that were vacated by a U.S. federal court in 2012 (the “Vacated Rules”). [2] The CFTC also… [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 12:15 am by Paul Caron
In re: Petition to Amend the Rules of the Supreme Court Relating to Admissions to the Bar and the Rules Regulating the Florida Bar, No. 20-1236 (Fla. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 7:46 pm
IN RE AMENDMENTS TO FLORIDA PROBATE RULES IN RE: AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA PROBATE RULES. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 1:16 pm
Part of the reason we are in the fix we're currently in is because of the 20th Amendment, which does two things: It sets inauguration day at January 20 and Jan. 3 as the date for a new Congress to convene, unless Congress sets a different date, which this time will be January 6. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 2:00 am by Keith Paul Bishop
Last December, I wrote this post concerning the Commissioner’s proposed amendments to Rule 260.204.9. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 6:06 am by Samuel Issacharoff
One escape route for the Supreme Court might be to read Section 3 into the context of the entirety of the 14th amendment and insist on congressional action pursuant to Section 5 of the amendment. [read post]