Search for: "In Re Breast Implant Cases"
Results 21 - 40
of 171
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Feb 2015, 1:44 pm
In In re Minnesota Breast Implant Litigation, 36 F. [read post]
19 May 2010, 8:13 am
White's lactation and breast drainage by removing the drains too soon, only to have to re-install them soon after. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 7:48 am
In the silicone gel breast implant litigation, after defense expert witnesses proffered meta-analyses[1], court-appointed expert witnesses adopted the approach and featured meta-analyses in their reports to the MDL court[2]. [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 5:00 am
After the breast implant brouhaha in the very early '90s, McGhan Medical Corporation obtained FDA approval to conduct a clinical trial studying the use of breast implants in breast augmentation patients. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 8:05 am
Freiman, “Silicone breast implant pathology. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 8:19 am
In re Breast Implant Cases, 942 F.Supp. 958 (E. [read post]
13 May 2012, 6:05 am
Breast implants. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 10:41 am
You know, just things like showing off her breast implants to anyone who will look and banging men in her office. [read post]
29 May 2015, 6:00 am
Symptoms include back and breast pain, as well as acne and weight gain. [read post]
29 May 2015, 6:00 am
Symptoms include back and breast pain, as well as acne and weight gain. [read post]
29 May 2015, 6:00 am
Symptoms include back and breast pain, as well as acne and weight gain. [read post]
25 Aug 2007, 5:16 pm
And I thought I would just share with you what science says today about silicone breast implants. [read post]
26 Sep 2007, 9:54 am
Sep. 24, 2007), finding broad preemption with respect to a Class III PMA device (breast implant). [read post]
25 Feb 2012, 10:04 am
Fla. 2009) Silicone – Breast Implants Allison v. [read post]
13 May 2009, 6:32 am
The court cannot permit a major pharmaceutical litigation to become the subject of the kind of 'rubber-stamp' expert opinions that have so marred mass litigations such as those involving asbestos and breast implants. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 10:28 am
Egilman was sufficiently clever to discern that if his “method” led to a conclusion that silicone gel breast implants cause autoimmune disease, but the Institute of Medicine, along with court-appointed experts, found no basis for a causal conclusion, then by modus tollens Egilman’s “method” was suspect and must be rejected.[1] This awareness likely explains the extent to which he went to cover up his involvement in the plaintiffs’ causation… [read post]
5 Jul 2015, 9:42 am
Liang, “Silicone Breast Implants and the Risk of Connective-Tissue Diseases and Symptoms,” 332 New Engl. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am
When the Supreme Court decided the Daubert case in June 1993, two recent verdicts in silicone-gel breast implant cases were fresh in memory.[1] The verdicts were large by the standards of the time, and the evidence presented for the claims that silicone caused autoimmune disease was extremely weak. [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 5:00 am
The MDL Panel, for example, may decide to consolidate a set of cases in a jurisdiction that previously had nothing to do with the litigation -- like sending Breast Implants to Alabama or Albuterol to Wyoming -- and all of a sudden an unanticipated body of local appellate law governs your federal issues, and your cases are either won or lost for reasons beyond your control. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 4:31 pm
The case was dismissed. [read post]
