Search for: "In re Art T."
Results 21 - 40
of 11,032
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2011, 6:00 am
We're in a backwards kind of mood so we'll answer your questions in reverse order.(3) No, you don't get your money back. [read post]
7 Jun 2008, 4:28 pm
Lots of art law in the news the last few days:If the guards at LACMA tell you you're too close to an artwork, you'd better step back. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 9:57 am
While some may call it sybaritism, T-Shirt Magazine advises: “[i]f you’re ballin’ you probably have a few expensive [...] [read post]
28 May 2013, 9:29 am
"[I]t is not enough to show that results are obtained which differfrom those obtained in the prior art: that difference must be shown to be anunexpected difference." [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 9:13 am
It’s when you know you’re licked before you begin, but you begin anyway and see it through no matter what. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 2:04 pm
Heather Hope, who has excellent taste (see last bullet point), says, of The Art of the Steal: "I hated this movie and don’t recommend that anyone see it. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 6:00 am
In summary, the inventor doesn't believe his invention is substantially similar to the existing technology in that patent application (or "prior art"). [read post]
5 May 2010, 12:18 pm
In re Art Harris concerned a petition for a writ of mandamus where Art Harris asked that the court of appeals direct the trial court to withdraw certain discovery orders. [read post]
13 Dec 2018, 5:20 am
But even if you can’t cast off your shame that quickly, through the lens of art, shame becomes valuable. [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 7:23 pm
"Once you’ve been clued in to the world of art forgery and recovered from the excitement of a good caper, you’re left with an itch in the back of your brain. [read post]
28 Feb 2009, 10:46 am
Don't be afraid to double dip. [read post]
9 Dec 2017, 4:42 am
” Art doesn’t become less art, or more problematic art, or unart, whenever someone’s feelings are hurt or offended by it. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 6:07 am
And art that just sits there and hangs on a wall just isn't as much fun. [read post]
25 Jan 2022, 1:17 am
"You can't judge a book from its cover". [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 9:30 am
You’re welcome. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 7:01 am
Cir. 2011) (“[T]he Board reasonably interpreted Rule 41.37 to require more substantive arguments in an appeal brief than a mere recitation of the claim elements and a naked assertion that the corresponding elements were not found in the prior art. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 2:50 pm
Cir. 2006) (“[T]he teaching of [a reference] is not limited to the specific invention disclosed. [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 8:35 am
Takeaway: The Federal Circuit doesn't reverse many BPAI decisions, but last week's In re Klein decision reversed all five obviousness rejections. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 5:43 am
Video games wouldn’t fit within VARA, which has a real sense of the physical and a narrow view of what is visual art. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 4:45 am
Don’t go near contact lenses – you’re not a film star. [read post]
