Search for: "In the Matter of the Petition of H. A. L." Results 21 - 40 of 366
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Aug 2023, 6:17 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“The Grievance Committee for the Ninth Judicial District served the respondent with a notice of petition dated July 22, 2020, and a verified petition dated July 16, 2020, containing 12 charges of professional misconduct, and the respondent served and filed a verified answer dated July 28, 2020. [read post]
8 May 2023, 4:01 am by Peter Mahler
First, there’s the buy-out appraisal under Business Corporation Law § 1118 triggered by a minority shareholder’s petition for judicial dissolution. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 2:09 pm by Holly
  Employment-based immigration Employers with U.S. immigration law legal needs may wish to sponsor skilled workers for nonimmigrant visas, including H-1B, I, E, L, O, TN, Q, R, and P visas. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 12:21 pm by Jacob Tingen
One important benefit that comes from immediate relative status is that the following grounds of inadmissibility don’t apply to you: You have worked without authorization in the U.S.You are not currently in lawful status in the U.S. at the time you apply for the green cardYou failed to maintain lawful statusYou entered on a Visa Waiver and didn’t leave the U.S.You otherwise violated the terms of your nonimmigrant visaUSCIS Policy Manual, Chapter 8… [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 6:18 am by Dan Bressler
Prof’l Labs., Inc., No. 0:21-cv-61756-GOODMAN[CONSENT] (S.D. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 12:00 am by Dimo Michailov
Practical Considerations As a practical matter,  we recommend filing concurrent H-4 and H-4 EAD petitions where available with the underlying I-129 petition especially where the I-129 petition is filed with premium processing. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
This post was prepared for a roundtable on Federation and Secession, convened as part of LevinsonFest 2022—a year-long series gathering scholars from diverse disciplines and viewpoints to reflect on Sandy Levinson’s influential work in constitutional law. [read post]
24 Dec 2022, 8:10 am by Joel R. Brandes
Additionally, the Family Court properly included the children as protected persons on the order of protection, as the evidence demonstrated that doing so was “necessary to further the purposes of protection” (Family Ct Act § 842[l]; see Matter of Lengiewicz v. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:55 am by David Kopel
At a previous stage in the case, I coauthored an amicus brief in support of the plaintiffs' cert. petition, Bianchi v. [read post]