Search for: "James V. White v. State of Mississippi" Results 21 - 40 of 92
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Nov 2018, 4:01 am by Edith Roberts
At The World and Everything In It (podcast), Mary Reichard discusses the oral arguments in Washington State Department of Licensing v. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
The southern states seceded to preserve slavery forever and to create a self-consciously white supremacist nation. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
This means that schools, libraries, and digital resources must now more than ever equip young people to bridge the distance between the promise and reality of American constitutional democracy.[13] Debate and disagreement relevant to Justice Thurgood Marshall once explained, “A child born to a Black mother in a state like Mississippi... has exactly the same rights as a white baby born to the wealthiest person in the United States. [read post]
23 Oct 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
For the Balkinization symposium on James E. [read post]
19 May 2007, 10:12 am
Rather, he invites the State to violate two of the most basic norms of a civilized society - that the State's penal authority be invoked only where necessary to serve the ends of justice, not the ends of a particular individual, and that punishment be imposed only where the State has adequate assurance that the punishment is justified.United States Supreme Court Justice, 1990(1)Robert Comer, Christopher Newton and Elijah Page have something in common, aside… [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 11:30 am by Mark Graber
Mississippi (1898) and Plessy v. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 12:57 pm by John Elwood
Then there is a case on the court’s original docket, Mississippi v. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 10:01 pm
  There are many state specific blogs related to family law topics, representing 38 states (and several foreign countries). [read post]
25 May 2018, 6:41 am by John Elwood
United States, 17-6262; auf Wiedersehen, James v. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
First, there is a lot of new material regarding the “loyal denominator” issue (see here and here): whether the former Confederate states were to be included in the Article V total of states of which three fourths were required to ratify an amendment, or whether (as I think) only three fourths of the states represented in Congress were required, because rebel states’ Article V naysaying power, like their Article I right to be… [read post]