Search for: "List of ORDERS ON PETITIONS FOR FURTHER REVIEW FILED August 20, 2013."
Results 21 - 40
of 55
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jan 2019, 12:30 am
Opinion issued December 20, 2018. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 2:55 pm
Deborah sought an interlocutory order to remove Robert as Trustee immediately which was denied in March 2013. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 9:27 am
The child was 13 years old, and had no adjudicated father and no father listed on his birth certificate. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 2:30 pm
Under that formula, where, as here, the parties are married for 20 years, the duration can be set at between 30–40% of the term – which would allow a maximum duration of eight years. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 5:55 am
The Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts has recently denied Jenzabar’s petition for further appellate review of this case -- another welcome victory for Long Bow, but we will likely need to pursue the deeper issues in another forum. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 5:55 am
The Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts has recently denied Jenzabar’s petition for further appellate review of this case -- another welcome victory for Long Bow, but we will likely need to pursue the deeper issues in another forum. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 7:52 am
She further moved for a modification of the December 20, 2013 agreed order and sought to terminate David's visitation rights with Andrew. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 8:25 am
Codified Laws 20-13-1 et seq. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm
In a direct listing, however, the company does not typically issue new shares. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 12:36 am
” The law was approved by 436 votes (with one abstaining). [19] On June 26, 2019, the law was approved by the Federation Council. [20] On June 29, 2019, the President of the Russian Federation Vladimir Putin signed it and on July 2, 2013, the law came into force after its official publication in the “Rossiyskaya Gazeta”. [21] According to the new Article 6.21. of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation: “1. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 6:08 am
In 2013, the plaintiff commenced the action for a divorce. [read post]
19 May 2017, 12:23 pm
Standard of Review We review summary judgments de novo. [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 5:44 am
This year’s review is set out below. [read post]
29 Jul 2017, 9:56 am
Defendant failed to file a Response opposing Plaintiff's Motion.After reviewing the attached billing invoices and Mr. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 5:01 pm
Further, the data analyzed by NFAP indicates that the stark increase in denials and delays is even greater for visa petition beneficiaries from India.[6] One of the results of this adjudicatory trend is a significant decrease in the number of L-1 visa petition filings with the USCIS Service Centers.[7] A review of recent RFEs and denials issued by the USCIS shows that the current theme in L-1 adjudications follows the following principles: Qualifying… [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 2:11 pm
Opinion Filed July 31, 2015. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 2:11 pm
Opinion Filed July 31, 2015. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 12:51 pm
Harkonen’s petition. [read post]
19 May 2017, 12:23 pm
-Dallas 2013, pet. denied). [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 3:41 pm
NCSLT 2005-3, the reviewing panel did not even give the debtors credit for the payment that they had made over the course of several years. [read post]
