Search for: "List of ORDERS ON PETITIONS FOR FURTHER REVIEW FILED May 25, 2011." Results 21 - 40 of 130
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Apr 2011, 10:41 am by Stefanie Levine
Examples of Petitions Filed in Reexamination Proceedings Relief requested Petitionable? [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 7:47 am by Joel R. Brandes
Companion animals are not listed, nor provided in, the text of the Automatic Orders. [read post]
Petition for review after the Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal in an action for writ of administrative mandate. [read post]
Petition for review after the Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal in an action for writ of administrative mandate. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 2:33 pm by Joel R. Brandes
Instead, it may be facts or evidence from which reasonable inferences may be drawn, beyond the mere proximity of two people themselves. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 8:40 am by Phil Cave
August 25, 2011), United States v. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 8:01 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
Citizenship and Immigration Services adjudicators denied or delayed between 63 percent to 90 percent of all L-1B petitions in 2011. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 8:01 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
Citizenship and Immigration Services adjudicators denied or delayed between 63 percent to 90 percent of all L-1B petitions in 2011. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 10:01 am by jonathanturley
So, with no further ado, here is this year’s updated list of actual cases related to Halloween. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 8:51 am by jonathanturley
So, with no further ado, here is this year’s updated list of actual cases related to Halloween. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 9:11 pm by smtaber
December 7, 2009 – A summary review of environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 9:20 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
Inc., ARB No. 13-074, ALJ No. 2005-ERA-006, slip op. at 12 (ARB Apr. 25, 2014), but that the ALJ had analyzed the case using MSPB authority that used analysis like that in Speegle. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 9:33 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
The district court concluded that “Egenera’s suggestion that Schulter may be relisted as an inventor as circumstances may dictate” was clearly inconsistent with its “September 2017 petition . . . that Schulter’s name was erroneously listed. [read post]
14 May 2016, 3:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
In June 2013, petitioner sought to review her personnel file and discovered that all of her satisfactory written formal and informal observations from the 2010-11 and 2011-12 school years were missing. [read post]