Search for: "Long v. Friend" Results 21 - 40 of 5,657
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 May 2024, 6:47 pm by Josh Blackman
She lingered there, glaring, for a long moment, recalled the couple, who texted their friends about the encounter. [read post]
19 May 2024, 9:05 pm by The Regulatory Review
Aug 29, 2023 | Could West Virginia v EPA Strengthen State Climate Laws | Scholars argue that a recent Supreme Court decision may bolster state climate lawsuits. [read post]
13 May 2024, 8:48 pm by AccelerateEditor
Charlie was referred to us by a friend and we were so fortunate to have him on board. [read post]
13 May 2024, 6:41 am by Dan Bressler
Nonlawyer employees of lawyers can be paid a share of the firm’s profits, so long as they are not paid a share of fees on individual cases or specific groups of cases. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
7 May 2024, 9:31 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
His friend James Madison is very keen to invest in this startup and become a shareholder, and manage the company on Thomas’s behalf as its CEO. [read post]
3 May 2024, 12:30 pm by John Ross
[Eagle-eyed readers might notice that the court cites Saunders v. [read post]