Search for: "Martin v. American Express, Inc." Results 21 - 40 of 103
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am by Bexis
Precision Airmotive Corp., 42 P.3d 1071, 1071 (Alaska 2002) (§20); Savage Arms, Inc. v. [read post]
Background on President Biden’s Executive Order on Promoting Competition in the American Economy On July 9, 2021, President Biden issued a sweeping proclamation on competition in the American economy, asserting that there has been too much consolidation across many different economic sectors and that this consolidation has harmed workers, farmers, small businesses, startups, and consumers, and has led to vast racial, income, and wealth inequalities.1  This Executive… [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 9:56 am by Eugene Volokh
In the 1950s, many Americans were understandably upset when tax exemptions benefited advocacy of Communist revolution and Communist tyranny (which explains the law struck down by the Court in Speiser v. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm by Bexis
  The American Law Institute’s unfortunate adoption of “strict liability” (sufficiently unfortunate, the ALI has done away with it except for manufacturing defect) missed a lot of product liability issues – the learned intermediary rule for one – that have become extremely widespread and important in product liability over the last 45 years. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 11:47 am by admin
Martin, to express his desire to take the test again. [read post]
14 May 2012, 8:24 am by Schachtman
Epstein expressed the view that asbestos exposure caused parietal pleural plaques, but these plaques rarely interfered with respiration. [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 12:00 pm
Corp., 58 NY2d 293, 305; Weiner v McGraw-Hill, Inc., 57 NY2d 458, 465-466; Martin v New York Life Ins. [read post]
21 Jun 2020, 9:02 pm by Joanna L. Grossman and Deborah L. Brake
The Second Circuit ruled in Altitude Express, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 12:23 pm
The Court, however, cited the US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit decision in Barcelona.com, Inc v Excelentisimo Ayuntamiento de Barcelona, 330 F.3d 616 (4th Cir,. 2003, here) and the Second Circuit ruling in ITC Ltd v Punchgini, 482 F.3d 135 (2d Cir. 2007) (the Bukhara case, here) to the effect that those provisions give non-US parties rights that are coextensive with, not greater than, those otherwise provided under the Lanham Act. [read post]