Search for: "Matter of Colby v Colby"
Results 21 - 40
of 45
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Sep 2016, 9:10 am
Nevertheless, to the extent it shields evidence from disclosure, it obstructs the fact-finding process (see Matter of Colby, 187 Misc 2d 695, 697). [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 6:30 am
A little while ago, I gave a presentation to the National Judicial Institute‘s annual family law conference on the more important innovations in family justice introduced in British Columbia over the past decade, and in preparing my paper I realized something that struck me as terribly important. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 1:35 pm
Thomas Colby & Peter J. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 8:06 am
Colby & Co. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 6:51 pm
Colby & Co. v. [read post]
20 May 2014, 6:08 am
But don’t get carried away with such peripheral matters: your real job is to make the most out of the case-law. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 6:02 am
By Sara Hutchins Jodka In Burns v. [read post]
23 Mar 2014, 3:15 pm
The court also cited with approval to a California decision, Colby v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 8:52 am
By Andrew DelaneyState Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 7:12 pm
Colby made a deal to testify against Evan. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 8:55 pm
For example, the intention behind the equal protection clause might be formulated at a relatively high level of generality--leading to the conclusion that segregation is unconstitutional--or at a very particular level--in which case the fact that the Reconstruction Congress segregated the District of Columbia schools might be thought to support the "separate but equal" principle of Plessy v. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 1:34 pm
Colby, 722 F. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 9:54 am
See, e.g., EEOC v. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 6:44 am
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion in the following matter: DA 10-0386, 2011 MT 48, STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 7:17 am
(Props to Tom Colby and Peter Smith for a longer discussion of this inconsistency in their academic work.) [read post]
31 Oct 2010, 12:30 pm
For example, the intention behind the equal protection clause might be formulated at a relatively high level of generality--leading to the conclusion that segregation is unconstitutional--or at a very particular level--in which case the fact that the Reconstruction Congress segregated the District of Columbia schools might be thought to support the "separate but equal" principle of Plessy v. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 10:01 am
Craig Colby v. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 7:34 pm
My name is Tom Galligan and since 2006 it has been my good fortune to serve as the President of Colby-Sawyer College in New London, New Hampshire where I am also a Professor in the Humanities Department. [read post]
30 Dec 2009, 6:30 am
Colby v. [read post]
19 Jul 2009, 2:07 pm
For example, the intention behind the equal protection clause might be formulated at a relatively high level of generality--leading to the conclusion that segregation is unconstitutional--or at a very particular level--in which case the fact that the Reconstruction Congress segregated the District of Columbia schools might be thought to support the "separate but equal" principle of Plessy v. [read post]
