Search for: "Means v. Indiana Financial Corp." Results 21 - 40 of 62
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Apr 2017, 3:01 pm
In addition, CSR has become a lever for civil society organizations to influence corporate practice and public policy.Advocates have seen CSR as a means of addressing governance gaps where government is weak. [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 11:37 am by R. Grace Rodriguez, Esq.
Most Cited CasesThe “party to be charged,” within meaning of rule that a contract coming within the statute of frauds is invalid unless it is memorialized by a writing subscribed by the party to be charged or by the party's agent, means the party to be charged in court with the performance to the obligation, i.e., the defendant in the action brought to enforce the contract. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 12:25 pm by Eugene Volokh
Say, for instance, that David Defendant is in a field where even the accusation (however unfounded) of some misconduct would mean massive financial cost. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 12:25 pm by Eugene Volokh
Say, for instance, that David Defendant is in a field where even the accusation (however unfounded) of some misconduct would mean massive financial cost. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 1:37 pm by Bexis
Smithkline Beecham Corp., 658 N.W.2d 127 (Mich. 2003); Duronio v. [read post]
9 Dec 2017, 1:07 am by Lorene Park
Microsoft and subsidiary LinkedIn employ at least 45 DACA recipients as software engineers, financial analysts, and in other positions. [read post]
., Illinois, Indiana, Rhode Island), and New York expressly permits tax FCA claims. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 5:30 am by Emily Chan
For example, when the Indiana Supreme Court affirmed a $325,000 verdict in a suit alleging assault and intentional infliction emotional distress claims in the 2008 case, Raess v. [read post]
The pendency of multiple, interconnected but not always clearly delineated, proceedings means that the Commission or litigants may contend that an issue raised in one of such proceedings should have been raised in another one of the related cases, and the issue is untimely or beyond the scope of the docket in which it is initially raised, further compounding the risks presented by the litigation around the expanded rule. [read post]