Search for: "Miller v. Correctional Medical Services" Results 21 - 40 of 97
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Sep 2017, 10:23 am by Arthur F. Coon
The Project and the City’s Administrative Proceedings and Decision The challenged CUP authorized conversion of an existing downtown office building to a medical clinic whose anticipated tenant (Planned Parenthood) would provide an array of medical services, potentially including medical abortions. [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 10:23 am by Arthur F. Coon
The Project and the City’s Administrative Proceedings and Decision The challenged CUP authorized conversion of an existing downtown office building to a medical clinic whose anticipated tenant (Planned Parenthood) would provide an array of medical services, potentially including medical abortions. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Michalak v General Medical Council & Ors, heard 4 Jul 2017. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 10:12 am by Jordan Brunner
Mary Spears is up next for team Nashiri, and she quickly corrects the record, saying that there were 1702 medical records given, not 1600 as Judge Spath had previously stated. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 5:07 pm by INFORRM
The purpose of this update is to correct, clarify and comment on media reports of family court cases, to explain and comment on published Judgments of family cases and to highlight other transparency news. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 12:04 pm by Edith Roberts
The district court had held that “Union Pacific violated Title VII, as amended by the PDA, because ‘it treats medical care women need to prevent pregnancy less favorably than it treats medical care needed t [read post]
16 Jul 2016, 2:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Sending her for an independent medical examination did not necessarily trigger the direct-threat framework (Felix v. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 6:07 am
MILLER, FEDERAL PRACTICE § 357 at 604 (1969)).Our standard of review in PRA cases is also de novo. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 2:50 pm by MOTP
In a similar vein, albeit based on different reasoning, the Supreme Court recently also approved the removal of claims against nursing homes (and, by extension, all medical malpractice claims) from the court system by blessing arbitration agreements in admission contracts even if they are not compliant with Texas law. [read post]
1 May 2015, 9:19 am by John Elwood
Starting on the rail is AEP Energy Services v. [read post]