Search for: "P. v. Blair" Results 21 - 40 of 99
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Aug 2015, 6:54 pm by mdkeenan
In People v Blair, a Defendant was convicted of driving on a suspended or revoked license in two separate cases. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 3:10 pm by Eric J. Shindler
Blair, 41 Cal. 2d 587, 599 (1953) (filing suit gave defendant notice that plaintiff viewed its failure to perform as a total breach of contract); and Sackett v. [read post]
16 Oct 2007, 2:41 pm
      As the New York Times’ Manohla Dargis writes, “she invokes God and country, blood and honor, life and death, bringing to mind at once Joan of Arc, Henry V, Winston Churchill and Tony Blair in one gaspingly unbelievable, cinematically climactic moment. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 5:00 am by Dennis Crouch
Snippets can be downloaded here: http://www.mbhb.com/snippets/bilski Topics include: Viewpoints on Life After Bilski v. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 12:24 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
The reviewing court is not free to reweigh the evidence or substitute its own judgment for that of the jury, Blair v. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
The decision in Blair v Horn, 2008 NY Slip Op 32581(U) [Not selected for publication in the Official Reports] suggests that a court could deem a retirement to be the equivalent of a resignation for the purposes of 4 NYCRR 5.3(b). [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 12:39 pm by admin
In October, President Obama signed HR 2892, The Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act of 2010, which contains a provision barring the transfer of Guantanamo detainees onto US soil except to stand trial (see Title V, Sec. 552). [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 4:48 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Blair J.A., at p. 722, also quoted Professor Fleming from The Law of Torts, (7th ed. 1987), at p. 450, as to the success of the reform brought to this area of the law by occupiers’ liability legislation: Its central feature was to abandon the timorous distinction between categories of entrants and subsume the law of occupiers to the unifying principle of a “common duty of care”. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 6:44 pm by Brian Shiffrin
" (6 Wigmore, § 1873, p 672 [emphasis in original].) [read post]