Search for: "PPS DATA, LLC"
Results 21 - 40
of 78
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jul 2019, 4:56 pm
Data Privacy and Data Protection Inforrm had a post on BA’s record fine of £183m from the Information Commissioner’s Office for data breach. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:11 am
And if the state and federal data is combined, a larger number of jurists supported arbitration in Texas because the Fifth Circuit opinion was a panel opinion while on the Texas Supreme Court a total of eight justices participated and decided the case without a dissent or concurrence. [read post]
19 May 2019, 4:15 pm
Data Protection and Data Privacy With GDPR’s first anniversary approaching, Stewart Room has an analysis on the pwc Data Protection and privacy insights blog analysing the first results of GDPR readiness programmes and explaining the importance of a purposeful data privacy approach. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 8:56 am
From Ars Technica, concerning OMICS and iMedPub, LLC :The practices of the companies, as documented by the FTC, are pretty egregious. [read post]
10 Mar 2019, 5:08 pm
Data Protection and Data Privacy On February 26, 2019, the European Data Protection Board (the “EDPB”) presented its first overview of the GDPR’s implementation and the roles and means of the national supervisory authorities to the European Parliament. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:37 pm
“Valuation Issues in Eminent Domain Litigation: What You Need to Know” Alan Ackerman, Esq. [read post]
27 Jan 2019, 4:19 pm
The representative claimant in the case of Lloyd v Google LLC has been granted permission to appeal by the Court of Appeal. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 6:45 am
Cir. 2004) (analyzing a patent “directed to a method” and stating that “[i]n the context of patent infringement actions, we have interpreted Rule 11 to require, at a minimum, that an attorney interpret the asserted patent claims and compare the accused device with those claims before filing a claim alleging infringement”); PPS Data, LLC [v. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 6:45 am
Cir. 2004) (analyzing a patent “directed to a method” and stating that “[i]n the context of patent infringement actions, we have interpreted Rule 11 to require, at a minimum, that an attorney interpret the asserted patent claims and compare the accused device with those claims before filing a claim alleging infringement”); PPS Data, LLC [v. [read post]
20 Oct 2018, 1:00 pm
Medical Devices IMAP M&A Sector Report (pp. 1-20, Rep.). [read post]
28 Aug 2018, 12:44 pm
McMahon, at pp.46-49, in Courcelle v. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 9:00 pm
In one portion of the agreement, PP promises to return any documents, photographs, or electronic data involving DD. [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 7:45 pm
A court in the Northern District of California in Google LLC v. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 4:58 am
The Memo at pp. 12. [read post]
19 Nov 2017, 5:45 am
A court in the Northern District of California in Google LLC v. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 2:46 pm
” (Id. at pp. 1045, 1049). [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 12:39 pm
(See Gonzales, supra, 215 Cal.App.4th at pp. 48-49 [concluding that the identical language in Wage Order No. 4 requires employers to separately pay piecerate workers for nonproductive time].) [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 1:31 pm
“Specialty drugs” are a fast growing sector of the pharmaceutical industry and are predicated to represent 50 percent of drug expenditures in the United States by 2020.[1] Specialty drugs are typically dispensed by specialty pharmacies. [read post]
18 Oct 2016, 8:35 am
Spy Phone Labs LLC. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2016, 9:36 am
(pp. 11) [ii]Ibid. pp. 5 [iii]Ibid. pp. 2 [iv]Ibid. pp. 3 [v]Ibid. pp. 4 [vi]Ibid. pp. 4 [vii]Ibid. pp. 5 [viii]Ibid. pp. 6-7 [ix]Ibid. pp. 4-5 [x]Ibid. pp. 7 [xi]Ibid. pp. 7 [xii]Ibid. pp. 9 [xiii]Ibid. pp. 9-10 [xiv]Ibid. pp. [read post]
