Search for: "People v Jacobs (James)" Results 21 - 40 of 104
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 May 2016, 4:30 am by SHG
This suit can make the oddest shaped guy look like James Bond. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 6:50 pm
Generations of people in the community were poisoned by lead, arsenic and other toxic substances, resulting in a devastating array of physical and mental illnesses and in some cases, death. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
Bruen is quite simply a national nightmare.In United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 4:02 am by Edith Roberts
” At The George Washington Law Review’s On the Docket blog, law student James Hannaway finds the result in China Agritech v. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal DeJoy Maintains Financial Ties to Former Company as USPS Awards It New $120 Million Contract MSN – Jacob Bogage (Washington Post) | Published: 8/6/2021 The U.S. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 3:25 am
To the express delight of the assembled flock of IP lawyers (or is it a “conspiracy” of IP lawyers, as per Sir Robin Jacob’s keynote speech?) [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 4:51 pm by INFORRM
The Inter-American Court of Human RightsIndigenous People Maya Kaqchikel from Sumpango v. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 9:24 am by Rishabh Bhandari, Jordan Brunner
In the Foreign Policy Essay, Jacob Stokes and Alexander Sullivan argued that China will not fix North Korea, offering four other areas of focus instead. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 1:37 pm
Jacobs, “Toward a Process-Based Approach to Failure-to-Warn Law,” 71 N.C. [read post]
23 Oct 2020, 9:05 pm by Peter Jacobs
” In District of Columbia v. [read post]
12 Feb 2023, 5:03 pm by INFORRM
On 9 February 2023, Master Davison dismissed the defendants’ application to strike out the claim in James Wilson v James Mendelsohn & Others [2023] EWHC 231 (KB). [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 8:09 am by Kurt Lash
Akhil Reed Amar (Yale) and Vikram David Amar (Illinois) in Trump v. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 4:19 pm by Ilya Somin
The expert near-consensus on this subject is backed by longstanding Supreme Court precedent, going back to United States v. [read post]