Search for: "Pfizer Inc. v. United States"
Results 21 - 40
of 252
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Sep 2009, 10:33 am
At the DIDA site, under Document Sources, you can read about some of those drug company lawsuits, in particular: United States of America ex rel. [read post]
25 Oct 2012, 11:01 am
Pfizer, Inc., 861 F. [read post]
1 Jun 2007, 9:05 am
(2) Whether, if the petition is not granted prior to September 25, 2007 -- when Pfizer's pediatric exclusivity for Norvasc comes to an end -- the Court should instead grant the petition and order the Court of Appeals' judgment vacated under United States v. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 3:47 pm
Pfizer, Inc., 825 F. [read post]
1 Jun 2007, 9:05 am
(2) Whether, if the petition is not granted prior to September 25, 2007 -- when Pfizer's pediatric exclusivity for Norvasc comes to an end -- the Court should instead grant the petition and order the Court of Appeals' judgment vacated under United States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 5:33 pm
MagSil Corp. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 6:07 am
In Goodridge v Pfizer Canada Inc., 2010 ONSC 1095 (Feb. 18, 2010), the plaintiffs claimed injuries from off-label use of Neurontin and its generic version. [read post]
8 Oct 2012, 10:34 am
Pfizer Inc. [read post]
23 Aug 2021, 2:12 am
28 U.S.C § 1498 (a) (Governmental Use) The United States (U.S.) does not have any provisions for a compulsory license. [read post]
30 May 2010, 3:55 pm
Kellogg, Brown & Root Service, Inc., and Pfizer, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2014, 8:55 pm
During an interference proceeding before the United States Patent and Trademark Office, now obviated under the first to file rules of the American Invents Act, Pfizer presented documentary and testimonial evidence that it had isolated and identified the desired cDNA before the Sanofi benefit date. [read post]
26 Jul 2007, 1:25 am
Inc. v. [read post]
20 Sep 2016, 7:43 pm
Pfizer, Inc., C.A. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 3:42 pm
Pfizer, Inc., No. [read post]
24 May 2011, 6:12 pm
Pfizer, Inc., 233 P.3d 1066 (Cal. 2010), make clear that section 17204 only requires that a party allege an injury in fact and that the injury was caused by the defendant. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 4:23 am
Pfizer, Inc., Docket Nos. 05-4863-cv (L), 05-6768-cv (CON), slip op. (2d Cir. [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 6:53 am
Pension Fund v. [read post]
24 May 2018, 12:27 am
Cir. 2007) (quoting United States v. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 2:05 am
United States, 880 F.2d 84, 86-87 (8th Cir. 1989).Kansas: Savina v. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 3:00 am
Pfizer stated that Corber v. [read post]
