Search for: "Phillips v. District of Columbia" Results 21 - 40 of 104
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Mar 2014, 7:32 am by Joy Waltemath
Relying on Wiggins v Phillip Morris, Inc., the defendant claimed he could not have violated Sec. 1681(b) because he was a “user” of consumer information, rather than a consumer reporting agency. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 9:15 pm by NCC Staff
Phillips and Josh Blackman discuss how a new data tool, corpus linguistics—which gives people the ability to search massive amounts of historical texts—can provide guidance about the original public meaning of the Constitution, and how their research with it shows there were flaws in both the majority opinion and dissent in the landmark Second Amendment case, District of Columbia v. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 8:30 am
It's hard to get an injunction enforcing a covenant not to compete that has a nationwide territory, but the Plaintiff was successful at that in the Middle District's decision last week in Philips Electronics North America Corp. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2014, 9:28 am by Kristen Fries
The United States District Court for the District of Columbia declared each of Alice’s patents invalid for not defining patent-eligible subject matter. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 4:30 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed for The New York Times, Linda Greenhouse considers Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia v. [read post]
30 Aug 2019, 5:41 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Cir. 2007)(emphasis added); see Trs. of Columbia Univ. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 3:53 am by Brandon Bartels
Columbia University political scientists Andrew Gelman (also a statistician), Jeffrey Lax, and Justin Phillips have published a compelling report in the New York Times that documents and discusses these trends. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 11:25 am by James Bickford
  Phillip Brasher of the Des Moines Register discusses Monsanto v. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 7:10 am by John Jascob
In FY 2018, the SEC’s Office of the Whistleblower (OWB) received 5,282 whistleblower tips from all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and 72 foreign nations. [read post]
22 May 2015, 12:26 pm
The District of Columbia Court of Appeals excluded the evidence, because the test had not gained general acceptance among the authorities in the fields of physiology and psychology. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 12:45 pm by Amy Howe
Arguing as a “friend of the court” supporting the retailers, Illinois Solicitor General David Franklin represented 34 states and the District of Columbia. [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 1:08 pm by Richard Renner
Case number: 11-cv-1271 (United States District Court for the District of Columbia) Case filed: July 13, 2011 Qualifying Judgment/Order: July 23, 2012 09/04/2012 12/03/2012 2012-83 SEC v. [read post]